Re: [aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

2019-10-16 Thread Iyán Méndez Veiga
El miércoles, 16 de octubre de 2019 22:50:09 (CEST) Eli Schwartz via aur- general escribió: > The solution is simple, and in accordance with long-standing package > policy, adwaita-qt is the "main" package, and all other packages must > provide/conflict against it. For more details, see: >

Re: [aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

2019-10-16 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 10/16/19 4:22 PM, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > Hi, > > I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today > @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the > arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after >

Re: [aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

2019-10-16 Thread Morgan Adamiec via aur-general
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 21:22, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > > Hi, > > I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today > @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the > arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after

[aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

2019-10-16 Thread Iyán Méndez Veiga
Hi, I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after reading the wiki I did a commit with those little changes. I am

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

2019-10-16 Thread David Runge
On 2019-10-11 14:44:27 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120 The results are in: Yes: 36 No: 7 Abstain: 6 Total: 49 Participation: 87.50% The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number of "Yes",