I think that is the most fair assessment of the situation that I have read
today.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:48 PM Connor Behan via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 2018-10-30 01:23 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:06 PM Daniel Cap
The only rule there that strikes me as potentially having been violated is
"respect other users". But I think that cuts both ways in this case to be
perfectly honest. It could be argued that Konstantin did not respect the
existing TUs initial responses to his questions. But that's debatable.
The
Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:54 PM Daniel Capella wrote:
> hate crimes and physical violence*
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Daniel Capella
> wrote:
>
>> > *b. *to distort or twist the sense or intention of: the reporters did
>> violence
Apologies for my mis-formatted email. You may need to expand the
quoted text to read it. I think I goofed it.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:52 AM Adam Levy
wrote:
>
> > Even if you are 100% correct, there were a lot of other messages, not
> > just the linked ones.
>
> First I want to mention that I
> Even if you are 100% correct, there were a lot of other messages, not
> just the linked ones.
First I want to mention that I did in fact read all of the emails, but
presumably someone trying to make a point about bullying in those
emails would have linked to the most contentious ones. So those
As an outsider sitting on the sidelines, with absolutely no dog in this
fight, I have to say that I don't believe that the messages you linked are
examples of bullying or personal attacks. The closest I saw to a personal
attack might be Eli saying that Konstantin is a control freak. I believe
that
> >> level dependencies, no matter from where they may be implicitly
> >> available (so yes, personally i add both, glibc and bash if required).
>
> On 02/27/2018 08:48 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> > Good to know. I will update my PKGBUILDs accordingly.
> >
> &
Good to know. I will update my PKGBUILDs accordingly.
Thank you
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 02/28/2018 02:23 AM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I am co-maintaining
Hi there,
I am co-maintaining a few AUR packages written in Golang and I just ran
namcap on my built package. I got the following output on a few of my
golang packages:
$ namcap influxdb-1.4.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
influxdb E: Dependency glibc detected and not included (libraries
Neat program!
It currently doesn't handle release candidate version tags. For example,
$ aur-out-of-date -pkg influxdb
[OUT-OF-DATE] [influxdb] Package influxdb should be updated from 1.4.3-1 to
1.5.0rc4
It might be worth adding an option to ignore version tags that end in
'rc*'. Or perhaps
10 matches
Mail list logo
