Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately. Worked, thanks again! -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany Email: aggr...@gmail.com WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > I've removed it manually, we're looking at a more permanent solution. Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately. Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

LoneVVolf wrote: > AUR has llvm33 , llvm38, llvm39, llvm4 and llvm 5 . Maybe your packages > can use one of those ? LLVM 3.5 is the last version which still has the old JIT backend, which is what Pure still needs right now. LLVM 3.4 would work just as well, but that's not available in the AUR,

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg > sets it from the first element of pkgname, and this is why the .SRCINFO > still shows it. I can add an explicit pkgbase=llvm35

[aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

The llvm35 package recently got kicked from extra, but I need it for my Pure package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pure/) which in turn is needed for a bunch of other packages I maintain in the AUR. So I resurrected llvm35 from extra, brushed it up a little so that it compiles again (also