On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 19:33 +0200, Morten Linderud via aur-general
wrote:
> The email has the CC.
>
> To: aur-reque...@archlinux.org
> Cc: not...@aur.archlinux.org, alejandroval...@live.com,
> michael.stra...@posteo.de
>
> Can you verify that the email wasn't caught by any spam filters?
On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 13:29 -0600, karx via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Georg, thank you for your reply.
> If I am understanding correctly, pkgrel is for changes to the
> PKGBUILD, and pkgver is for changes to the actual sources. Is this
> correct?
>
> Yash
Correct. Although the PKGBUILD doesn't
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 11:02 +0100, Fabien Spindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is the visp package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/visp/
> that needs to be updated with 3.3.0 release.
>
> In https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=visp
> changes
> should be
>
> > pkgver=3.3.0
On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 13:17 +0100, Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've built my first PKGBUILD based on Brunio Renié's vaudtax,
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vaudtax/
>
> https://gitlab.com/greut/getax
>
> Do you think I could propose it as is to aur-request? Do you
Hi Jean Lucas,
I've been reading your TU application and I wish you the best of luck.
However, I can't seem to find the GPG key you're using on any
keyservers. Did you happen to forget to submit it somewhere?
Best,
Bert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 12:51 +0500, Vladimir Bauer via aur-general
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a PKGBUILD I would like to submit:
> https://github.com/vbauerster/getparty-PKGBUILD
>
> What is further steps?
>
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Submitting_packages
but
Hi all,
The spam account jha321 just left a comment on ruby-yajl-ruby, and a
few others. Could he be deleted?
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jha321/comments
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 16:10:
On January 22, 2019 4:03:29 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
David Runge
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
Why is use
David Runge schreef op 2019-01-22 12:30:
On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote:
On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote:
Why is use
`$(gem env gemdir)`
Instead of
`$(ruby -e'puts Gem.default_dir')`
It's shorter and you don't have to spawn a ruby process to print
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 11:17 -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> The package_*() depends override globally listed depends. If pikaur
> does
> not try to install the global depends together with the makedepends
> before the build happens... this is a bug in pikaur and pikaur is
> broken.
>
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 10:24 -0500, Storm Dragon via aur-general wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have had a few people post that they are having trouble with this
> since it became a split package. Currently, I am unable to reproduce
> the problems. I have installed it both with yay and with makepkg. I
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
