Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

On 2019-10-11 14:44:27 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120 The results are in: Yes: 36 No: 7 Abstain: 6 Total: 49 Participation: 87.50% The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number o

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

On 2019-10-08 14:35:22 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal > of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an > Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in > regards to Ray's deve

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

Hey Giancarlo, On 2019-10-08 10:41:44 (-0300), Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 > days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days. Correct, somehow I had the 'Removal of a TU' rules in mind when writing the mail. > Other

[aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

Hi all, I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status. Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Retiring as a Trusted User

On 2019-10-02 11:10:59 (+0200), Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > openshot libopenshot libopenshot-audio I adopted those (and libquicktime). Thank you! -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 2019-08-16 17:10:41 (-0400), Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote: > I would definitely be willing to very politely ask the five respective > companies for redistribution permissions for Arch Linux. In the case of reaper, I've already been in contact with Cockos to try and move that to [community]

Re: [aur-general] Spam account/comments

On 2019-07-01 21:20:01 (+0200), Joan Figueras via aur-general wrote: > Hi, just saw a comment in one of my packages (icecat). The account seems > clearly a spammer: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jennifer247/comments Thanks! Taken care of. -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] Another spammer

On 2019-06-18 02:05:37 (+0300), Edvinas Valatka via aur-general wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/account/rosaleefay Thanks! Taken care of! -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Purge of packages orphaned, out-of-date, and last updated before 2017

On 2019-01-26 08:01:46 (+0100), Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > Not too long after I became TU I deleted something of ~2000 packages, > based on similar "criteria" and after seeing no "objections" on IRC > after a while. After the deed was done I got emails, angry shouting on > IRC and

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On 2019-01-22 17:09:35 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote: > On Tue Jan 8 20:19:43 UTC 2019, David Runge wrote: > > * pkgname: avoid composition > What should I do? It's more readable and less error-prone to do `pkgname=name` instead of `pkgname="name${something_else}"`. > Why i

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On 2018-12-27 15:50:49 (+0800), Metal A-wing wrote: > I'm sorry, my last application was bad a few days ago. Not so easy for reviews, if you're applying between Christmas and New Years (lots of people are not home and/or busy hanging out with people then). > I am a Web Developer. uav cloud

Re: [aur-general] Sound in systemd service

Hi! TL;DR: Don't. Use what the package provides and start it as a systemd user service! On 2019-01-02 00:56:24 (+0100), NicoHood wrote: > I currently try to create a system-wide spotifyd service that can play > music from a dedicated user/group. I used the spotifyd package from AUR > as a base:

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

On 2018-11-28 20:10:52 (+0100), Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 11/18/18 3:52 AM, Xyne wrote: > > On 2018-11-12 12:22 +0100 > > Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > >> Not saying nobody does, but sponsoring should quite frankly be far more > >> then just to agree and like that an

Re: [aur-general] Spam Account

On 2018-11-23 08:40:32 (+), Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: > Another spam account: > https://aur.archlinux.org/account/markwilliamson/ Thanks for the notification! The account is now suspended and spam comments have been removed. Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 2018-11-09 19:05:58 (+0100), David Runge wrote: > Let's vote! :) The results are in (the vote ended nearly an hour ago)! Yes: 26 No:9 Abstain: 12 Participation 90.38% (come on, don't drop the ball on this! ;-)) I have just updated your account sta

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 2018-11-09 13:11:19 (-0500), Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > This definitely lists the right time period: > https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_addition_of_a_tu Yep, sorry, that was just a brainfart from my side. ;-) Here's the link to the vote btw:

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

As the (newish, but still not updated [1]) discussion period of 14 days is now over, I have started the vote. Thanks again to all reviewers and active TUs in this discussion period! I think Brett will make a good TU! Let's vote! :) [1]

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

On 2018-10-25 08:26:11 (-0600), Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > I am being sponsored by dvzrv. I hereby ACK that and apologize for the confusion the last time (again). > I would like to get valuable tools promoted into [community], such as > residualvm or the 'pass' plasmoid (after

Re: [aur-general] Greetings and Documentation Proposals

On 2018-10-07 20:06:47 (+0200), David Runge wrote: > I hereby ACK my sponsorship! > > Let the discussion begin :-) As there has been quite a misunderstanding on my side, regarding when and how Brett wanted to apply to become a TU, please disregard my last e-mail. (I should stop replying

Re: [aur-general] Greetings and Documentation Proposals

On October 7, 2018 5:41:41 PM GMT+02:00, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: >Hello, fellow Archers. My name is Brett and I've been making PKGBUILDs >for the AUR for some time under the moniker 'Ainola'. A number of these > >packages have been kindly pulled into [community] by

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On 2018-04-04 11:01:20 (-0500), Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > Please be specific. We aren't talking about hours and bumping > > package version. Common sense can be used to know when taking > > action will make people worse-off. > > The package was managed so efficiently that even

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On 2018-02-03 14:41:33 (+0100), Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > You are probably right about that. I think however that this should be > reported upstream to systemd rather than being part of the xss-lock > package. Hmm, I could find a (probably) related RFE [1]. [1]

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On 2018-02-03 14:00:29 (+0100), Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > As far as I can tell, xss-lock is already run when I resume from a > suspend. Ah lol... I was under the impression, that xss-lock would need to be told to lock. It seems loginctl sends out the 'lock-sessions' after waking up from suspend by

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

Hi Pierre, On 2018-01-23 10:14:12 (+0100), Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > No answer from the dev so far, so I've packaged the latest commit as Eli > suggested. > Let me know if there is anything wrong. nice to see this in [community]! Could you also include a service file, that

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On January 19, 2018 9:42:26 AM GMT+01:00, Bennett Piater wrote: > > >On 01/18/2018 09:37 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >> See the bug report I linked in the first reply. >> >>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On November 1, 2017 11:17:27 AM GMT+01:00, Eli Schwartz wrote: >On 10/31/2017 03:17 PM, Ray Rashif via aur-general wrote: >> Congratulations, David, you are now an Arch Linux Trusted User! Thanks for... well, the trust I guess! >Congratulations, David! > >As Ray said,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 2017-10-25 00:08:31 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > Well, yeah. It's more clear what you're doing. > > FWIW, I typically use a source url like this: > > _file=742770 > source=("${_pkgname}-${pkgver}.xpi::https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/${_file}/;) Hmm, this doesn't seem to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

On 2017-10-24 22:43:50 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > I do have one thing to say to David: please do think about the time > commitment associated with this. If you think that you won't be able > to commit much starting out, then it will be quite sad moving forward. I have thought about this a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hey again, multiple occurences are not quoted again. On 2017-10-22 23:44:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > crypted-backups-git: > - empty variables and arrays are messy Fixed. > - unquoted $pkgdir, though $srcdir is consistently quoted Fixed. > - the pkgver() fallback for non-tagged repos can

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hi Eli, thanks for the many remarks. On 2017-10-22 23:44:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz wrote: > General commentary on your AUR packages, since xxarhtna is being a > slacker who slacks: Due to two work arrangements this week, I won't have time to fix them before this evening. I'll get back to it

[aur-general] TU Application: David Runge

Hi all, my name is David Runge. You may have come across me somewhere on the wiki [1], the forums [2] (not so recently), the AUR [3] or the mailing lists (mainly arch-general). I'm sponsored by Ray Rashif. I'm 31, currently live in Berlin and have just finished a Master's degree in audio

Re: [aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

Helloes, On 2016-09-10 23:27:59 (+0200), Johannes Löthberg wrote: > Some mishaps meant that the old blacklist was still in effect even though it > was no longer updated, it should work now! It does! Thank you! Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

> Did it used to be in community? Because it isn't in the repos, but it is Yes. > in the svntogit archive. (And if it was dropped from the repos, I > thought the branch was supposed to be dropped.) I see. Alucryd moved it to the AUR: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50206 I adopted it afterwards

[aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

Helloes everyone, I was just trying to push a new version of mantisbt (1.3.1), which I adopted from alucryd. However, I get this odd message: remote: error: package is blacklisted: mantisbt remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To aur.archlinux.org:mantisbt ! [remote