On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 at 16:03:29, SpinFlo wrote:
Hi. y try to update a pkgbuild. but server refuses by:
remote: error: The following error occurred when parsing commit
remote: error: 8ba6f94497960275d1a78f913163df30b238cf72:
remote: error: missing install file: avidemux.install
remote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 at 13:41:18, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Hey guys,
I am trying to get my packages sorted for AUR4 while I have access to my
Arch computer which is only for a few more hours today but the
aur4.archlinux.org site is currently down for maintenance. Anyone know when
the site is due
On Sun, 31 May 2015 at 20:55:17, Duru Can Celasun wrote:
[...]
Not a major concern, but will it be possible to merge comments / votes
/ flags from the old AUR instance?
What do you mean by merge comments? Current package comments and votes
can be retained, i.e. merged into the new database
The original thread is too cluttered already so I decided to submit the
second version in a separate thread. The only real change is that we
decided to not make aur.archlinux.org a read-only archive such that
users still get updates during the transition period (if AUR package
maintainers decide
On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 23:13:33, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
I noticed that aur4 have some new strings but the transifex page has not
pudated they string in a whole and also there are new complate and +50%
languages.
Is planed to update the transifex sometime soon? and the lang selector in
On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 11:49:07, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου wrote:
[...]
Since you're at it, why don't you make the git push part a bit
clearer, since many of us are unfamiliar with git? Ie, you could put
the steps like that:
1. Create a new (empty) package base foobar, run the following command:
$ ssh
On Sat, 23 May 2015 at 11:34:38, Manuel Reimer wrote:
Hello,
I'm doing my first steps with AUR 4.0 and I'm asked to commit both,
PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO.
.SRCINFO is automatically created with makepkg --source, but there is
no need for a tarball when pushing to GIT. So what I think that
Hi,
I just added a section to the AUR article in the Arch wiki that
describes how to submit packages to the new AUR. Here is a draft of the
notification that I plan to send to all AUR package maintainers on June
1st:
Hello,
This is an automated email to all AUR package maintainers.
Hi,
If you are using the AUR 4.0.0 testing environment on
aur-dev.archlinux.org, please note that we now use the default SSH port
22 instead of . This means that you can drop the : part from
your Git remote URIs or remove the Port line from your local SSH
configuration.
We are
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 10:40:44, Manuel Reimer wrote:
[...]
I've disabled everything, that has something to do with filtering, now.
Still no success.
Is it a big deal to configure the envelope sender?
There are 400 AUR users with GMX email addresses. One of them just
registered
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 10:55:30, Manuel Reimer wrote:
[...]
Yes. No mail on the GMX web interface.
Is there maybe some minor typo in the mail address in your database?
Maybe a space character at the end or beginning?
The email address used with the AUR account exactly matches the one
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 11:05:56, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 10:55:30, Manuel Reimer wrote:
[...]
Yes. No mail on the GMX web interface.
Is there maybe some minor typo in the mail address in your database?
Maybe a space character at the end or beginning
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 11:14:43, Manuel Reimer wrote:
[...]
I was able to register. I received the initial password reset mail and I
was able to finish registration.
BUT: I'm unable to request password reset with this test account, too.
So maybe the interesting question is: Is there
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 11:38:48, Manuel Reimer wrote:
On 05/17/2015 11:36 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 at 11:14:43, Manuel Reimer wrote:
[...]
I was able to register. I received the initial password reset mail and I
was able to finish registration.
BUT: I'm unable
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 at 11:18:59, Bernard Baeyens wrote:
oxygen-gtk3 cannot be found in AUR although there is a PKGBUILD at:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ox/oxygen-gtk3/PKGBUILD
This PKGBUILD is for oxygen-gtk3 1.0.0-1 but the last version in Extra
was 1.4.1-1
So is this package
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 at 19:34:38, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:
Good news. Where can I find out more about this aurweb 4.0.0?
[...]
The email I sent to this list ~2 months ago [1] might be a good starting
point. If you are curious about what the transition period will look
like, check [2].
[1]
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 at 17:55:27, Tai-Lin Chu wrote:
I hope we can have another purge for dead(both orphaned and inactive)
packages.
[...]
The AUR will be recreated from scratch (with zero packages) when aurweb
4.0.0 will be released, so there's no need for such a cleanup now.
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 at 08:59:41, Florian Bruhin wrote:
[...]
Is there a list of packages which will be orphaned because of this
somewhere?
[...]
I uploaded a list here [1].
Regards,
Lukas
[1] http://sprunge.us/CLJf
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 at 06:00:18, Zac Audette wrote:
I made my AUR account around a year ago. I moved off arch for a period of
time and have forgotten my username/password to the AUR account linked to
this email. I requested the password for my AUR account via email from the
AUR password
Hi,
Here is a list of ~12000 inactive AUR accounts [1] that I am going to
purge soon. I noticed the list includes a fair amount of spam accounts
this time but just in case your user name appears on that list and you
want to keep it, please re-login within the next couple of days.
For more
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 at 16:50:13, Troy Engel wrote:
I struggled a bit to package a tagged stable release from
git.kernel.org to complement the -git package, finally figured out a
method that's simple[1] but hidden from the cgit webUI; wanted to add
to the wiki as a FAQ/tip for others. Would
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 at 16:50:13, Troy Engel wrote:
I struggled a bit to package a tagged stable release from
git.kernel.org to complement the -git package, finally figured out a
method that's simple[1] but hidden from the cgit webUI; wanted to add
to the wiki as a FAQ/tip for others. Would
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 at 12:34:40, LoneVVolf wrote:
On 23-01-15 00:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Let me elaborate just a bit: There currently isn't a bcusdk package
base in the AUR, so a new package base is created upon package
submission. That new package base contains a package eibd which
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 at 00:02:02, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:24:24 +0100
Sven Fischer s...@leiderfischer.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
trying to update small fixes to the eibd package, AUR upload always
responses to me with error: failed to upload
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 at 18:05:17, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:41:53 -0300
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote:
Hi,
I posted a message ending with the character on the AUR today,
but that character got stripped.
Does AUR not have UTF-8 support? Have I
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 at 17:03:45, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading about the upcoming AUR 4.0 with git repositories for each
package (which is very much welcome for a variety of reasons!).
I'm curious how existing packages will be handled. I already keep git repos
for
my
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 01:50:55, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
2014-12-29 21:30 GMT-03:00 SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com:
for me need this after clone repository
'git add *' - to add/update files to repo
'git commit -m 'message'' - to add the commit to repo
and then push the
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 02:34:14, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 29/12, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
AUR package maintainers are then asked to upload their packages
to aur-dev.archlinux.org and co-maintain them on aur.archlinux.org and
the Git repository on aur-dev.archlinux.org for some time (roughly
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 05:39:28, Ido Rosen wrote:
Posted in other thread, but:
The AUR4 update hook compares an str to an int when looking at the
pkginfo['epoch'], so packages with an epoch set fail to pass the
update hook. Probably should check that the string pkginfo['epoch']
contains
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 12:19:35, Marcel Korpel wrote:
* Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com (Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:22:24
+0100):
You need to actually specify the remote too, named origin by default
when you clone a repo, so `git push origin master`
Now it works. Strange, as with other
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 12:17:06, Christian Hesse wrote:
Hello Arch Linux community,
[...]
My main focus is on system administration, but I do have an attitude to
programming. A number of open source projects includes changes by me, some
just being bug fixes, some introducing new features. I
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 15:46:18, SpinFlo wrote:
Hi
Howto remove a own repo (only make setup) if created with bad name?
Don't worry about it now -- I don't care about orphan packages in a
testing environment. When AUR 4.0.0 goes live, you can file a package
deletion request to delete a
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.5.1 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
Apart from several bug fixes, this release deprecates mkaurball. We now
recommend to use `makepkg --source` from pacman 4.2.0.
For a comprehensive list of changes, please
The 4.0.0 release brings Git repositories to AUR packages. You can test
a pre-alpha version at aur-dev.archlinux.org [1]. In order to submit
packages, you can follow these steps:
1. Create a new SSH key pair for the AUR. While this step is not
strictly necessary (you can use any existing SSH
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 at 22:16:45, Ido Rosen wrote:
Will all existing AUR packages automatically get their own git
repositories or will we have to resubmit all packages?
[...]
Both. The current plan is as follows:
A couple of weeks before the official release of 4.0.0, I will reset the
setup on
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 at 22:52:18, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:28:04 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
It is a huge AUR cleanup.
Which means we should start saving PKGBUILDS of the dependences of our
packages too, in case they don't make it, so we can
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 at 23:26:38, wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:01:45PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
If you spot any major flaws or have suggestions for the new interface,
please let me know.
I see that the submit button has been removed since uploads are now
handled through git
Hello Pablo,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 00:01:05, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
But if someone missed the deadline (something that I'm sure will happend
for a few hundeds at least either because lazines, bussyness or not want
(or can't) reach aur-dev page) there are a place to take the PKGBUILD that
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 00:12:06, SpinFlo wrote:
mmm fails for me
refuses upload because remote: error: missing .SRCINFO
but that file is include in the root of the repository
i missing steps?
I use:
- git clone ssh+git://aur-dev.archlinux.org/foobar.git/ (change foobar with
the
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 at 00:22:53, David Phillips wrote:
I'd like to chime in. I'm in the same boat as SpinFlo. Only thing I
did differently is add PKGBUILD in one commit, attempt to push, then
added .SRCINFO in another commit.
[...]
Oh, every commit needs to refer to a tree object that
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.5.0 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release adds support for architecture-specific sources (resp.
provides, conflicts, replaces) and for .SRCINFO, both of which will be
included in the next pacman release.
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 at 01:05:48, Ian D. Scott wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 12:38:24AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Assumed somebody can recommend a good helper to search the AUR, I'm
willing to test it.
I don't know if any AUR helpers support this, but you can just get a
list of all AUR
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 at 13:57:07, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
Hello everybody,
Today i was notified by the AUR system that somebody called arcanis silently
merged the package python2-vdirsyncer into vdirsyncer, leaving other
packages with missing dependencies.
Vdirsyncer runs under both
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 at 00:25:41, Justin Dray wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think it would be a good idea to link to the package for a request when
it has been fulfilled. The messages do not show up in the same thread and
there is no link, just 'request #1234 accepted' and which TU has accepted
it.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 at 13:23:24, Lex Black wrote:
Currently there is one package that gets uploaded every minute (and most
likely without changes).
An automated process that went out of control? Or is such a setup ok?
I temporarily suspended Ruslan82's account. Thanks for reporting.
Sergei,
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 at 18:49:53, Bruno Saraiva wrote:
I did already reset my password, AND I thought I knew the right username.
Even tried different ones in hopes of hitting the right one before
bothering you guys with this.
Could you be so kind to send me my username, attached to this email
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 08:47:40, carstene1ns wrote:
While the new AUR request functionality is a good thing and widely
accepted (over 500 requests yet), it also brings us some problems:
(1)inhibition threshold - It is much easier to remove a package now.
(2)response time - Requests get
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 14:35:21, LoneVVolf wrote:
Perhaps we could treat the aur-requests more like a bug tracker ?
a possible flow :
request is filed and gets unassigned status
TUs review unassigned requests
If they feel they are right person to handle it, they assign it to
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 14:43:13, Yamakaky wrote:
In fact, AUR misses git and a bug tracker per package. Now, package
improvements suggestions need to be written in the comments, it's not
very efficient.
Another problem : often I see packages where the last comment reports a
problem
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 17:50:54, Ido Rosen wrote:
[...]
Seeing the discussion about using info/alternates to store git objects
for all repos in one place, it sounds a lot like they're reinventing
the wheel... Git integration would be fantastic, but I'd strongly
suggest that AUR devs not
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 23:56:25, Ido Rosen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
[...]
* Dynamically connect each AUR package to a repository, so that it is
easy to switch to a new repository if someone maintains a fork of the
same
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 at 00:21:41, Ido Rosen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Johannes Löthberg
johan...@kyriasis.com wrote:
On 17/08, Ido Rosen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
* Dynamically connect each AUR package
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 at 20:00:48, Xyne wrote:
[...]
At first I thought that the pkgbase could be uploaded without anything in the
pkgnames array as a placeholder for merging, but that would lump all the votes
into the pkgbase and not the individual packages.
Am I missing something?
Votes
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 at 20:35:10, Xyne wrote:
[...]
Votes are always only stored per package base. You cannot vote on a
package.
Note that it is also possible to merge two packages into another package
without having a transition period where the original packages are
unavailable [1].
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 at 15:05:16, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 at 12:44:53, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
[...]
Let the discussion period begin, the voting period will start on
2014-08-05.
[...]
The discussion period is over. Please cast your votes [1].
Results:
* Yes: 24
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 at 10:02:30, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 08/08/14 03:43 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
In the past, what packages provided by AUR needed signing, because after
uploading somebody manipulated the packages? AFAIK https for the AUR
downloads and checksums for the upstream downloads in
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 at 12:44:53, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
[...]
Let the discussion period begin, the voting period will start on
2014-08-05.
[...]
The discussion period is over. Please cast your votes [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=76
Hi,
since it was mentioned on IRC: It looks like Federico Cinelli is
inactive and should be brought up for special removal according to [1].
We usually try not to be overly pedantic with these rules, but Federico
has been MIA for a long time now:
* Last SVN commit on 2013-12-04.
* Did not send a
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.3 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes a bug fix to the user statistics and Trusted User
interface, as well as Translation updates.
For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 at 13:04:28, Karthik K wrote:
I'm trying to register with the AUR site, but every time I fill up the
registration form and submit the details, the page just refreshes and just
goes back to the original state.
Is this a known bug? How can new users register with the AUR
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.1 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes bug fixes regarding the account registration form
and translations.
For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As
usual, bugs
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.2 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes several bug fixes regarding the requests
interface.
For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As
usual, bugs should be reported
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 at 18:33:48, Karthik K wrote:
Able to register now. This is the message, I get after the register page
The account, *username*, has been successfully created.
A password reset key has been sent to your e-mail address.
Following the link in the mail takes me to a
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.0 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes several improvements to the package request
feature and a couple of bug fixes. The PKGBUILD parser has been dropped,
you can no longer upload source
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 at 21:49:56, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
[...]
https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2do=indexswitch=1 says
Note: The AUR is essentially in maintanence mode. No new features are
planned.
which in light of
https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 at 14:38:44, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
[...]
1. We can drop the PKGBUILD parser from the AUR. The parser will still
be available in the upcoming release but it will be marked as
deprecated and a warning will be displayed whenever someone tries to
upload a source
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 09:56:18, Attila Bukor wrote:
On 07/08/2014 06:27 PM, Steven Honeyman wrote:
The trouble is there are too many people that don't (or can't) think
about *why* something might not be working. It's often the users'
fault :)
Suppose someone sets ld.gold as their
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 01:09:05, Rob McCathie wrote:
Hello AUR General,
I am a Manjaro team member and have been an Arch user for ~5 years. I
still run Arch proper on many systems and test my AUR packages on Arch
proper (just thought i'd get that out of the way ;-p )
We've had to remove
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.3.0 has just been released. The
official AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes several improvements to the package request
feature and a couple of bug fixes.
For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2].
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.2.0 has just been released. The
official AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
You can now send deletion, merge and orphan requests by using the File
Request link in the package actions box. Please use the web interface
instead of manually sending
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 at 22:03:28, Steven Honeyman wrote:
Nice! Does the 14 day rule still apply for orphan requests?
[...]
Yes, however, there is no need to inform the maintainer manually any
longer since maintainers get notified when a request is created.
Also, note to Trusted Users: Package
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 at 16:57:00, Oliver Bandel wrote:
Hello,
I get an error message about wrong permissions
in the AUR-source-file.
I had wrong permissions for my PKGBUILD and changed that,
created the sourcep-package again.
Nevertheless the problem could not be solved.
I used
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 at 08:12:23, Florian Bruhin wrote:
* Hector Martinez-Seara hse...@gmail.com [2014-06-05 08:56:00 +0300]:
Notice that before AUR 3 just calling makepkg --source was enough. Any
good reason
for this change? If there any possibility as Philip proposes that this is
done in
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 at 09:08:48, Florian Bruhin wrote:
* Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de [2014-06-05 09:03:29 +0200]:
Note that this issue will vanish soon anyway since the next major AUR
release will provide Git repositories for all AUR packages. You will no
longer need to create
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 at 09:52:11, William Giokas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:28:15AM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 at 09:08:48, Florian Bruhin wrote:
* Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de [2014-06-05 09:03:29 +0200]:
Note that this issue will vanish soon
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.1.0 has just been released. The
official AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
This release includes several bug fixes, the RPC interface now reports
package base IDs, long lists of source files are collapsed and a Search
wiki link has been added to
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 09:39:23, Stefan Tatschner wrote:
I accidentally forgot the 'python-' prefix in my pkgbuild. So please
remove this one here [1]. I'm sorry for this inconvenience.
Deleted, thanks!
Thanks!
Stefan
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plaintable/
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 09:19:15, Stefan Tatschner wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I created new packages for my project pynote. Today I realized
that the new AUR 3.0 now has split package support.
So please delete:
- pynote-docs [1]
- pynote-docs-git [2]
Both deleted. Thanks for reporting!
I
On Sat, 31 May 2014 at 21:08:34, Yichao Yu wrote:
[...]
It is a bit unfortunate that this process makes merging a bit more
complicated and results in packages being unavailable for a short
transition period (see steps 1 to 3). I didn't come up with something
better yet. Should we give TUs
Hi,
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 13:36:29, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to upload a split package of sddm -qt5-git and -git
(attached), but when I upload it, it says: You are not allowed to
overwrite the sddm-qt5-git package.. I'm a maintainer of both of
course.
Is this a bug? If not,
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 16:16:08, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
That's very unfortunate and quite a bit counter-intuitive. Is this final?
[...]
No, it's not. As I said in the other thread [1] on this topic, I am open
for suggestions.
[1]
On Fri, 30 May 2014 at 03:54:09, Hong Shick Pak wrote:
[...]
I didn't try changing my AUR username before the update, but I'm trying
to it from Hspasta to Hspak and I seem to be getting an irrelevant
(generic?) error messages:
The username is invalid.
It must be between 3 and 16
On Fri, 30 May 2014 at 14:03:00, artux wrote:
[...]
Suppose I want to move/merge a single pkgbuild to a split build, is that
possible? Will the pkgbase change, so the single pkgbuld will
disappear automatically? Or the other way round, I want to move a pkg
from split build to single build?
On Thu, 29 May 2014 at 10:52:58, Andreas Radke wrote:
[...]
The RSS feed seems empty.
Fixed in maint. Thanks!
-Andy
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.0.0 has just been released. The
official AUR setup [1] has already been updated.
Note that in order to build source packages for the AUR, you will now
need to use a tool called mkaurball (instead of `makepkg --source`). It
is included in the
On Tue, 27 May 2014 at 22:11:55, Mariusz Libera wrote:
Hi,
please delete fwts-efi-runtime-dkms -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts-efi-runtime-dkms/
I'm maintainer of this package and I want to make it a split of fwts -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts/
Deleted, thanks!
On Mon, 12 May 2014 at 21:59:53, Xyne wrote:
[...]
There is no normal way to delete user accounts at the moment. The motivation
for this was the preservation of comments in discussions. I think there was
some discussion recently about enabling account deletion by transferring
comments to a
A first release candidate of the AUR 3.0.0 has been released! You can
give it a try at [1]. Note that due to internal changes, the setup at
aur-dev.archlinux.org uses a different database than aur.archlinux.org.
You should be able login using your regular AUR account, though.
The most important
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 at 13:01:33, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble sending a new package to AUR.
AUR replies Missing arch variable in PKGBUILD.
The PKGBUILD is pasted below; `namcap PKGBUILD` says nothing
(i. e. all OK).
cut here
# Maintainer: Ivan Shapovalov
Hello,
I plan to do the next major AUR release by late May or June and I
thought this might be a good time to let people know what is going on
behind the scenes.
AUR 3.0.0 will be able to read metadata from source packages. These
metadata will be read from a file called .AURINFO (contained in
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 at 18:14:21, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 at 20:26:22, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
[...]
You can now cast your votes [1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Hi,
I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least
500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000
users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and
you think
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Hi,
I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least
500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000
users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and
you think
's/David Reisner/Lukas Fleischer/g'
on your inbox (the misspelling of Dave's name comes in useful here!)
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 at 19:07:19, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 00:32:08, Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really
Hi,
I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least
500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000
users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and
you think it shouldn't be there, please let me know.
Side effects:
* The
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Hi,
I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least
500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000
users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and
you think
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 00:32:08, Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
package
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 00:32:08, Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
package
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 09:31:41, Doug Newgard wrote:
[...]
Ok, so let's look at just that one.
I must admit that I only had a look at very few packages before agreeing
to the sponsorship. However I did advice Jonas to have a look at his
packages and update the one's that are flagged
101 - 200 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
