Done, thanks! Eventually I did all of the above (a "replaces" field in the
new package which seems to have no impact though, an echo output with the
deprecation message, a deprecation message in the package description, a
comment on the AUR page and an out of date notification with again a
Hi guys,
thanks for your input! I tried to create a new xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng
package and ran into the issue that the AUR's git repository ssh://
a...@aur.archlinux.org/xfce4-multiload-ng-plugin.git was not empty but had
some outdated PKGBUILD in it. But it had no .SRCINFO file and (probably
Hi guys,
I maintain the multiload-ng AUR packages, in particular
xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk3. After
the recent Xfce 4.16 update the gtk2 version stopped building, so I would
like to delete xfce4-plugin-multiload-ng-gtk2 and somehow migrate the users
to
I had the same issue with the `medit` package. It's an editor with some
nice features, in particular, an integrated bash terminal. I have been
pointed to the fact that pygtk is deprecated some months ago, but removing
pygtk as dependency leads to the bash terminal functionality vanishing. I
Hello,
the user https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ZafarYaqoob posted a spam
comment at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-json-maybexs/
Please have a look!
Another one: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nehasharma/comments
Am Di., 13. Aug. 2019 um 03:15 Uhr schrieb Santiago Torres-Arias via
aur-general :
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 01:12:41PM -0400, Andy Kluger via aur-general
> wrote:
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ASDqwelk/comments
> Done.
>
Also, are you sure that the dependencies are actually dependencies, that
is, are required on runtime? Say, pacman and git rather look like
makedependencies. But of course, I might be completely wrong.
More spam: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arun6/comments
I would also mention that frequent version bumping is quite disturbing.
Imho, git packages should not be updated by the package maintainer (unless
there are some very significant changes involved) - this way every user can
decide when to update while fresh installs will get the most recent git
First thing coming to mind: Did you possibly forget to update the .SRCINFO
file?
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 18:27 Uhr schrieb Shay Gover via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a
> pkgver() and pkgrel().
>
I think, Konstantin refers to
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=simpletools
Konstantin, I think, you are missing the make command (at least I only see
cmake and make install commands. It should look something like
build() {
mkdir -p "${srcdir}/${pkgname}/build"
cd
Unfortunately, I don't know Go and in general have too little programming
skills and experience to propose any code modifications. But I have an
idea: What about introducing some variables which the package maintainers
would put into their PKGBUILD and which are then parsed by aur-out-of-date?
The
Very nice and useful! It works for me, though just a few of my PKGBUILDs
are displaying status information. I am wondering, what about PKGBUILDs
whose source is hosted at Launchpad or Sourceforge? Those are quite common
hosters, are there plans to add them? Thanks!
2018-02-01 17:08 GMT+01:00
Looks good to me, the only minor thing coming to mind is: Maybe
license=('custom')
is better fitting the specification:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license
2018-01-23 22:59 GMT+01:00 Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> Hello all
>
> This is
@1) Sorry, I am using the GMail web interface and forgot that it is quoting
previous mails automatically.
@2) Thanks, I will have read it up at some point (I'm a bit ill currently,
so probably in a few days).
Since we are speaking about it, where is a good place to read the
documentation? :) I have got along with
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages
so far but looks like this is not enough for some cases...
2017-11-13 13:26 GMT+01:00 Eli Schwartz
Actually, I also thought so but when I tried, git told me that the repo is
up to date, so nothing changed and the package didn't appear in the AUR as
well...
2017-11-13 12:54 GMT+01:00 Carlos Mogas da Silva via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> On 2017-11-13 10:57, Michael Ko
Hello everybody,
about a month ago I submitted the skypeforlinux-beta-bin package to the AUR
due to an issue which appeared in newer skypeforlinux versions. Yesterday I
decided to get this package deleted because several people reported and I
could verify myself that the issue was fixed in the
Thanks!
2013/3/3 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca
*BLAMMO*
merged into sm-ssc-hg minus comments, thanks
Hello, list!
I'm the current maintainer of stepmania-svn (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stepmania-svn/) which builds the SVN
version of the old Stepmania 4 branch. Since there already exist packages
for the HG version of Stepmania 5 (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-ssc-hg) as well as
Please delete: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33095
I've reuploaded the package as perl-gtk2-notify.
Thanks,
Michael
21 matches
Mail list logo
