Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 11:03 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote: > Congratulation!Nicola, you become a Trusted User now. :) > > I'm glad to see Nicola become a TU. > > I was planning to weigh in on the discussion, even though I'm not a > TU > myself, since I've had a very impression of Nicola when

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 12:25 +0200, Balló György via aur-general wrote: > The voting period is over. The results: > > Yes: 27 > No: 4 > Abstain: 2 > > Congratulation! Nicola, you become a Trusted User now. :) > > -- > György Balló > Trusted User Such a great news! I feel really honored to be

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 18:06 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > What about the packages provided by ghc?  Guess you could do > something  > similar to get the provides list from pacman, hmm..  Thanks though! GHC only updates once every 4-5 months and provides few packages, so I don't mind handling

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 15:17 +0200, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > I've thought about using cblrepo to maintain a few things, but was  > wondering how you add and make sure the ghc/distro packages are up > to  > date in the cblrepo database? You use cblrepo to add new packages to your

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 14:30 +0200, Levente Polyak wrote: > Any chance you feel like you need a new project and want to make > xmonad > work with wayland? :P :D Judging from the comment on GitHub issue [1] it seems that unfortunatly such thing is impossible. [1] 

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 14:30 +0200, Levente Polyak wrote: > Hi Nicola, > > sounds great to get atom/electron into [community]. > > On 07/23/2016 06:39 AM, Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote: > > > > When I first started using Atom, I didn't like the fact that th

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 05:23 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > perhaps it was sending both HTML and plaintext, signing the wrong > one, > and then mailman stripped the HTML (ruining the signature) once it > was > sent? > > ~Celti I was indeed sending both (I disabled HTML now), and it was

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 02:28:24 -0700 "Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" wrote: > Your message fails verification here, too, both using claws-mail's > PGP/MIME plugin and downloading the raw message and verifying it using > gpg on the command line. Have you tried manually verifying your

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 02:28 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:51:52 +0900 > > Nicola Squartini via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > Evolution shows "Good signature" to me. > > > > On Sun, 2016-

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

Evolution shows "Good signature" to me. On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 09:00 +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > Don't want to sound picky, but it seems like the PGP signature of your e-mail > is wrong :p signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[aur-general] Trusted User application

Hi, My name is Nicola Squartini, long time Arch Linux user and enthusiast. I would like to become a Trusted User and György Balló offered to sponsor my application. I maintain the unofficial [atom] repository [1], and as a Trusted User my first mission will be to bring Atom and Electron to