Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

Hey, I've got no input on the name at this point (after reading through everything). Just keep in mind that if you decide to keep the command 'aur', it will conflict with aurutils as mentioned before. Also, if I'd use the package I would expect a command like 'aur-publish' what is more

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

I'm thinking of naming the software after "aur-publisher", while keeping the terminal command as "aur". Any observation with that? Alberto

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

On 10/30/19 4:38 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > AUR: >> Alad deleted aur-git: >> >> Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is >> in order? > > That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and > only one day has passed. > >

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

Em outubro 30, 2019 17:38 Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general escreveu: AUR: Alad deleted aur-git: Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is in order? That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and only one day has passed. I

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

AUR: Alad deleted aur-git: Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is in order? That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and only one day has passed. I haven't had time that fast for thinking a new name and requesting a change, which