On 2015-06-12 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 09:43:00, G. Schlisio wrote:
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
after a year,
Am 18.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Connor Behan:
[...]
Does anyone know an easy way to hide Popularity with a userscript or
userstyle? [...]
Given that the index of the column not changes, this works:
$('table.results thead tr th:nth-child(5)').hide();
$('table.results tbody tr
On 12/06/15 07:45 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org
wrote:
No, and valuable != popular :)
Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
good a bias as any other.
And let's leave completely out of focus that
* Andrejs Mivreņiks m...@gim.fastmail.fm (Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:26:08
+0300):
I noticed that the Popularity colon has been added to the list of
packages. What does this value actually mean? How is it being
calculated?
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 09:43:00, G. Schlisio wrote:
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only).
does
Lukas on aur-dev: Popularity is the sum of all votes with each vote
being weighted with a factor of 0.98 per day since its creation.
thats quite a fast wear-off, i think.
after a year, there is virtually nothing left (6e-4 only).
does this really meet the intention?
signature.asc
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
No, and valuable != popular :)
Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
good a bias as any other.
And let's leave completely out of focus that the bias that is needed
for a package to
On 12 June 2015 at 13:11, LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, we don't care
about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
today.
Low number of new votes != not used anymore
Many high quality, useful packages target
On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, we don't care
about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used
today.
Low number of new votes != not used anymore
Many high quality, useful packages target a specific group of users.
Does that make them less valuable ?
LVV