[aur-general] IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-13 Thread Reto Kaiser
Preferably we want to achieve: - No download of full tarball for users that use the system jre - Default of installing the bundled jre (because that's the recommendation from jetbrains). - Only 1 source package to reduce maintenance I count 4 options: A) 2 packages: "base-with-jre" and "base-witho

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-05 Thread 张海 via aur-general
Yes I would also totally agree with the split package approach for an optional jre. And FYI, you can find CLion a perfect example for implementing this: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=clion . Eli Schwartz via aur-general 于2017年2月6日周一 上午1:59写道: > On 02/05/2017 07:17 AM, Ret

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-05 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 02/05/2017 07:17 AM, Reto Kaiser wrote: >> I personally prefer the flag thing > [...] >> The "-meta" thing is a little... > [...] >> The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now. > > Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. > How about a single PKGFILE, which

Re: [aur-general] IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-05 Thread Det via aur-general
Reto Kaiser reto at retokaiser.com (Sun Feb 5 12:17:00 UTC 2017) > Det nimetonmaili at gmail.com (Sat Feb 4 15:57:20 UTC 2017) > > I personally prefer the flag thing > [...] > > The "-meta" thing is a little... > [...] > > The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now. > > Agree, the thi

[aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-05 Thread Reto Kaiser
> I personally prefer the flag thing [...] > The "-meta" thing is a little... [...] > The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now. Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. How about a single PKGFILE, which creates two packages with the "split package" mechanism

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-04 Thread Det via aur-general
Reto Kaiser reto at retokaiser.com (Thu Feb 2 19:38:33 UTC 2017) (Mailing list didn't accept my message, sorry for sending it again) I've created the "-bundled-jre" version of the IDEA package after discussion with the maintainer of the "-ultimate-edition" version ("uwolfer"). Some people want

[aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-02 Thread Reto Kaiser
(Mailing list didn't accept my message, sorry for sending it again) I've created the "-bundled-jre" version of the IDEA package after discussion with the maintainer of the "-ultimate-edition" version ("uwolfer"). Some people want to have the bundled JRE, others would like to use a system-wide ins

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos via aur-general
On 02/02/17, Det via aur-general wrote: > Sup, > > Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR > (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): > > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ > (most popular one, no bundled JRE) > - https://

Re: [aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Det via aur-general
Det said on Thu Feb 2 06:25:58 UTC 2017: Sup, Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ (most popular one, no bundled JRE) -https://aur.archlinux.o

[aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's

2017-02-01 Thread Det via aur-general
Sup, Currently we have 3 non-split IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate's in the AUR (there are other ones too, but they're not duplicates): - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/ (most popular one, no bundled JRE) - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ue-bundled-jre/