On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 07:17 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> I would prefer if someone adopted and ammended it to that of Xorg's
> fork,
that's what i'm doing :)
> but only after allowing someone else to copy the original
> contents and upload them as linuxwacom-whatever.
>
linuxwacom is now obsolete
On 8 February 2010 07:12, Ranguvar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote:
>> please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by
>> "illicium" in the comments section
>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:12 -0500, Ranguvar wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote:
> > please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by
> > "illicium" in the comments section
> > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted
> > maintainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 18:01, M Rawash wrote:
> please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by
> "illicium" in the comments section
> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted
> maintainer a couple of
please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by
"illicium" in the comments section
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted
maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response.
thanks,
M Rawash
