Le 11/01/2017 à 19:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit :
> On 01/11/2017 01:15 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote:
>
>> After a quick glance at your install file, I think it should be as
>> simple and short as this (+eventual notice for CoW):
>> post_install() {
>> systemd-sysusers bi
Le 07/01/2017 à 16:41, Tom Zander a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the
> upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I
> would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than
> debian, I m
On 01/11/2017 01:15 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote:
> After a quick glance at your install file, I think it should be as
> simple and short as this (+eventual notice for CoW):
> post_install() {
> systemd-sysusers bitcoin-classic.conf
> systemd-tmpfiles --create bitcoin-classic.con
Le 11/01/2017 à 16:19, Doug Newgard a écrit :
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:22:05 +0100
> Tom Zander wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
>>> Hardcoding the
>>> version here also makes no sense when you could just use $pkgver and only
>>> have to update it in one pl
Le 11/01/2017 à 18:01, Tom Zander a écrit :
> On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 09:19:45 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
>> I'm not talking about the package function, I'm talking about the .install
>> file with the post_{install,upgrade,remove} scriptlets. Specifically:
> My apologies, I must have misread :)
On 01/11/2017 12:01 PM, Tom Zander wrote:
> I have not found out how pacman treats config files on upgrades, removes and
> reinstalls.
> The point here is that the config file should not be overwritten by the
> package version on upgrade, it should not be deleted when the package is
> deleted (a
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 09:19:45 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
> I'm not talking about the package function, I'm talking about the .install
> file with the post_{install,upgrade,remove} scriptlets. Specifically:
My apologies, I must have misread :)
I have to ask a bit more since your pointers are
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:22:05 +0100
Tom Zander wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
> > Alright, I've looked at the first one. There's a whole lot of
> > simplification you could do, and a few actual problems.
> >
> > Problems:
> >
> > You need to rename the sour
Le 11/01/2017 à 13:22, Tom Zander a écrit :
> On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
>> Alright, I've looked at the first one. There's a whole lot of
>> simplification you could do, and a few actual problems.
>>
>> Problems:
>>
>> You need to rename the source file. It's just
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 18:53:46 CET Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote:
> > There are 4, almost identical, versions.
> >
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-classic/
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-classic-daemon/
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-classi
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote:
> Alright, I've looked at the first one. There's a whole lot of
> simplification you could do, and a few actual problems.
>
> Problems:
>
> You need to rename the source file. It's just "v1.2.0.tar.gz" which is
> very generic and could
On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:41:42 +0100
Tom Zander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the
> upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I
> would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than
>
Hi Tom,
Le 07/01/2017 à 16:41, Tom Zander a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the
> upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I
> would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than
> deb
Hi,
I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the
upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I
would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than
debian, I might add ;)
There are 4, almost identical, versions.
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
