On Sun 09 Aug 2020 17:12, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 8/9/20 4:59 PM, Anatoly Bashmakov via aur-general wrote:
3) Packaging versioned gems. In previous example the package will be
called ruby-loofah-2_3 (or something) and add "provides" in PKGBUILD. It
is not forbidden by package
On 8/9/20 4:59 PM, Anatoly Bashmakov via aur-general wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I need feedback on packaging ruby gems.
>
> First, I don't think packaging every gem of the latest version makes a
> lot of sense. For development there are rvm/rbenv/etc that solve this
> problem. The only gems need to
Hello.
I need feedback on packaging ruby gems.
First, I don't think packaging every gem of the latest version makes a
lot of sense. For development there are rvm/rbenv/etc that solve this
problem. The only gems need to package (I think) are gems that are
required by end-user applications.
