[aur-general] Questions from a new TU

2009-04-12 Thread Xyne
Hi, Just let me know if there is a more appropriate place for this and sorry for all eventual noobishness. 1) Why are the x86_64 and i686 tags stripped out of package names? Wouldn't it make more sense to use these tags to determine the port when uploading binary packages to community? This

Re: [aur-general] Questions from a new TU

2009-04-12 Thread Allan McRae
Xyne wrote: Hi, Just let me know if there is a more appropriate place for this and sorry for all eventual noobishness. 1) Why are the x86_64 and i686 tags stripped out of package names? Wouldn't it make more sense to use these tags to determine the port when uploading binary packages to

Re: [aur-general] Questions from a new TU

2009-04-12 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta
2009/4/12 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca: [ snip ] Wouldn't it make more sense to use these tags to determine the port when uploading binary packages to community? This would also be useful for uploading any packages (which I suppose need to be uploaded twice). Just to clarify, currently [community]