On 04-07-17 10:19, NicoHood wrote:
About the original suggestion for the AUR:
I think its worth to have a pinned comment on the AUR page. The package
maintainer should add it if an user gives him the hint. If he doesnt
accept it a TU should check if the request is valid and pin the users
comment
I want to point out another view from this situation:
What if an outdated package is moved to AUR and does not have a new
package with the replace=() variable? I personally had this several
times and those packages are still kept on the system.
This gave me some broken dependencies but also old s
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:45:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:00:50 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
>>You could suggest it on the package's AUR page.
>
>Hi,
>
>yes, I could ask to do it for dependent packages such as
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xombrero/ even while
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:00:50 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
>You could suggest it on the package's AUR page.
Hi,
yes, I could ask to do it for dependent packages such as
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xombrero/ even while I'm not using
it.
I could ask to do it for https://aur.archlin
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:25:09 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
> >This is the primary question here. If it's the maintainer then... what
> >is this email thread even for?
>
> It's about sense of responsibility. As already pointed out,
> s
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:25:09 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote:
>This is the primary question here. If it's the maintainer then... what
>is this email thread even for?
It's about sense of responsibility. As already pointed out,
something like the webkit PKGBUILDs are objectively PKGBUILDs with
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>
> >Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who
> >are you proposing should be responsible for determining what packages
> >should come with warn
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>... That is entirely up to the maintainer of said package.
Hi,
yes and this shouldn't change. I just want to suggest to be responsible
and add a note.
>Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who
>a
On 07/02/2017 03:09 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that users should decide on their own, if they wish to
> install high risk vulnerable software, so I'm not writing because a
> deletion request was rejected.
>
> I want to make a suggestion.
>
> A pinned comment could warn about
Hi,
I understand that users should decide on their own, if they wish to
install high risk vulnerable software, so I'm not writing because a
deletion request was rejected.
I want to make a suggestion.
A pinned comment could warn about the high security risk and
assuming that upstream of the origi
10 matches
Mail list logo
