[aur-general] Deletion request of darktable-svn (28117)

2009-10-26 Thread Christian Himpel
Hi, the darktable-svn[1] package was replaced with darktable-git[2]. Please remove the darktable-svn package, since subversion is no longer supported in this project. Thanks and kind regards, chressie [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28117 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request of darktable-svn (28117)

2009-10-26 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Christian Himpel chres...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, the darktable-svn[1] package was replaced with darktable-git[2]. Please remove the darktable-svn package, since subversion is no longer supported in this project. Thanks and kind regards, chressie [1]

Re: [aur-general] TU Vote Results: Angel Velásquez (angvp)

2009-10-26 Thread Xyne
Jaroslav Lichtblau t...@dragonlord.cz wrote: Everyone returns Welcome back, Angel! Cheers Jaroslav They always come back. ¡Enhorabuena, Angel!

[aur-general] AUR server maintenance.

2009-10-26 Thread Loui Chang
Hello everyone. If anyone is wondering what's going on with the AUR, I'm doing server maintenance right now. Things should be back up 'soon'. Cheers.

Re: [aur-general] AUR server maintenance.

2009-10-26 Thread Karol Babioch
On Mo, 2009-10-26 at 15:27 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: Hello everyone. If anyone is wondering what's going on with the AUR, I'm doing server maintenance right now. Things should be back up 'soon'. Cheers. Good to know, as I was wondering why the AUR is down without any announcement. --

[aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Ranguvar
Hello, I see that the package 'llvm' is in [community], is orphaned, and is out-of-date. I've spent considerable time working on packaging LLVM and its add-ons, the Clang C-family compiler front-end and the GCC frontend. Therefore, I'd like to help package LLVM. I already wrote a PKGBUILD for

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Hi, I'm using LLVM myself, especially with clang and the static analyzer. I would like to see LLVM and clang separated, however the clang version is only available via svn and that depends on LLVM-svn very much. So I think it's better to build a general LLVM package with the gcc- frontend for

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Ranguvar
It appears that Clang is available as an actual release this time around, so no need for SVN :) See this: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.6 As for the splitting of the packages, it will be either difficult or impossible to separate LLVM and Clang, is the problem. Plus, I anticipate

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote: It appears that Clang is available as an actual release this time around, so no need for SVN :) See this: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.6 Oh huebsch! ... or sweet in English ... As for the splitting of the packages, it will be either difficult

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Ranguvar
Very well, I'll make a prototype PKGBUILD that has sections for each install and then post it here, good luck :) I do think it odd though that Clang would be larger than GCC, I guess we'll have to see. On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Tobias Kieslich tob...@justdreams.dewrote: On Mon, 26 Oct

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Thanks, I posted my llvm-clang-svn PKGBUILD in AUR, not all of the things made it into the actual build. I like to have all scan-* wrappers included as they are handy and depend on each other (scan-build -V invokes scan-view automatically after a test build). They PKGBUILD is in the comments of

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Ranguvar
Sorry, no idea what you're talking about in that first paragraph? Where is the PKGBUILD? And what do you mean by scan-* wrappers? On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Tobias Kieslich tob...@justdreams.dewrote: Thanks, I posted my llvm-clang-svn PKGBUILD in AUR, not all of the things made it

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote: Sorry, no idea what you're talking about in that first paragraph? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20222 latest comment by neri (i attach my personal latest PKGBUILD to this mail) Where is the PKGBUILD? And what do you mean by scan-* wrappers?

Re: [aur-general] Packaging LLVM

2009-10-26 Thread Ranguvar
Just did a build with and without Clang. The difference comes out to about 12MiB, actually -- 69MiB for LLVM, and 81MiB for LLVM+Clang. 12MiB is, incidentally, the size of the /usr/libexec/clang-cc file you mentioned, so that's basically all the size difference. Attached is a PKGBUILD which

[aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?

2009-10-26 Thread Phillip Smith
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?

Re: [aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?

2009-10-26 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith arch-gene...@fukawi2.nl wrote: I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR? The package in AUR

Re: [aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?

2009-10-26 Thread Phillip Smith
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with the latest xulrunner. Ah, I didn't notice that... Crisis averted! ;)