Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 04/08/2018 05:51 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 04/08/2018 07:49 AM, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: >> On 08.04.2018 05:01, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >>> If you're really afraid of someone running as either your user, or some >>> user with the power to hijack your

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 04/08/2018 07:49 AM, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote: > On 08.04.2018 05:01, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> If you're really afraid of someone running as either your user, or some >> user with the power to hijack your SSH session, while you're trying to >> sign something, then they

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

Morten Linderud writes: > What i have done now is to launch a second gpg-agent that only > provides an -extra socket with no caching what so ever. I thought of something along those lines. Can you detail the commands so that we can put that on the wiki? -- Pierre

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 06:09:27PM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > > Use the `ignore-cache-for-signing` option in gpg-agent. Unsure if you can > > enable > > this only for connections to soyuz. > > But that's only for signing, so that won't do if I have subkeys used for > other purposes

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

> Use the `ignore-cache-for-signing` option in gpg-agent. Unsure if you can > enable > this only for connections to soyuz. But that's only for signing, so that won't do if I have subkeys used for other purposes under the same master key, right? -- Pierre Neidhardt signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 05:58:11PM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > What's the best practice to disable password caching? Set the timeout > to zero? > > Does anyone know if it's possible to have have a zero-timeout when on > soyuz while having another timeout time locally?

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

What's the best practice to disable password caching? Set the timeout to zero? Does anyone know if it's possible to have have a zero-timeout when on soyuz while having another timeout time locally? -- Pierre Neidhardt signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On 08.04.2018 05:01, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > If you're really afraid of someone running as either your user, or some > user with the power to hijack your SSH session, while you're trying to > sign something, then they could just switch out your built files anyway. > There's literally

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Albert Graef wrote: > Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately. Worked, thanks again! -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany Email: aggr...@gmail.com WWW:https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > I've removed it manually, we're looking at a more permanent solution. Thanks, Eli! I'll give it another go immediately. Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

LoneVVolf wrote: > AUR has llvm33 , llvm38, llvm39, llvm4 and llvm 5 . Maybe your packages > can use one of those ? LLVM 3.5 is the last version which still has the old JIT backend, which is what Pure still needs right now. LLVM 3.4 would work just as well, but that's not available in the AUR,

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On 04/08/2018 03:29 AM, Albert Graef via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general > wrote: >> Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg >> sets it from the first element of pkgname, and this is why

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Explicitly contrary to the PKGBUILD spec; if pkgbase is unset, makepkg > sets it from the first element of pkgname, and this is why the .SRCINFO > still shows it. I can add an explicit pkgbase=llvm35