Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

2018-11-12 Thread Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general
Hi, > The word "council" may just be bad choice here as people obviously fear > the goal is to establish power to a few. This is to the same degree > about power as having forum mods, bug wranglers, wiki admins, master key > holders and devops is about having power: Not at all. Agreed. If the

Re: [aur-general] Package present in aur-git, but not in the aur

2018-11-12 Thread David Adler via aur-general
On November 11, 2018 3:20:11 PM UTC, pianoslum via aur-general wrote: ... >As I don't have much experience with packaging, I would be glad for any > >feedback! provides=(elster) is superfluous. It would be required, alongside conflicts=('elster'), for a differently named VCS version like

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

2018-11-12 Thread Levente Polyak via aur-general
On 11/12/18 12:54 AM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On 11-11-18, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: >> On TU applications, TU participation and package quality: >> = >> >> Many Trusted Users have brought up their concerns regarding the lack >> of proper vetting of packages put