[aur-general] AUR requests not handled anymore?

2020-05-05 Thread Christoph Gysin via aur-general
I have made two deletion requests on my packages 2 weeks ago, that were never handled: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-April/039815.html https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-April/039825.html Has the process changed? What can I do to get these handled?

Re: [aur-general] intel-opencl-sdk updated to 2020, probably poorly

2020-05-05 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 5/5/20 1:46 PM, Nick Black via aur-general wrote: > Late last night, I put together an update to intel-opencl-sdk, > updating it from the 2017 edition to 2020. This was by far the > most difficult PKGBUILD I've ever done, and I suspect it is less > than optimal in one or more ways. > > If

Re: [aur-general] intel-opencl-sdk updated to 2020, probably poorly

2020-05-05 Thread Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 01:46:49PM -0400, Nick Black via aur-general wrote: > Late last night, I put together an update to intel-opencl-sdk, > updating it from the 2017 edition to 2020. This was by far the > most difficult PKGBUILD I've ever done, and I suspect it is less > than optimal in one or

[aur-general] intel-opencl-sdk updated to 2020, probably poorly

2020-05-05 Thread Nick Black via aur-general
Late last night, I put together an update to intel-opencl-sdk, updating it from the 2017 edition to 2020. This was by far the most difficult PKGBUILD I've ever done, and I suspect it is less than optimal in one or more ways. If anyone feels competent to take a look at the packaging or (more