Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:36:20PM +, Levente Polyak wrote: > On 09/10/2017 03:16 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > > User. I’m a student in Germa

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:01:58PM +, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > Hai, > > On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK Eli Schwartz wrote: > > python-i3-py: > > - It is probably not important to point out in the description which > > programming language it uses, especially when the pkgname

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:51:19PM +, Levente Polyak wrote: > On 09/14/2017 03:43 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:01:58PM +, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > >> Hai, > >> > >> On Sunday, 10 September 2017 19:55:16 MSK El

Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?y

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:01:18PM +, NicoHood wrote: > On 09/18/2017 12:06 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > > Em setembro 17, 2017 5:57 Jelle van der Waa escreveu: > >> > >> I sincerely don't believe that this will have the right affect, it will > >> be treated as spam. > >> > >> Maybe we

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 06:35:44PM +, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-16 10:57:44) > > Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-10 15:24:15) > > > I confirm my sponsorship and such. Let the discussion period begin! > > > > > > > Discussion period has

[aur-general] gnupg test

Hi Am 10/09/2017 um 15:24 schrieb Johannes Löthberg via aur-general: > Quoting Alad Wenter via aur-general (2017-09-10 15:16:57) >> Hello everyone, >> >> My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted >> User. I’m a student in Germa

[aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Hello everyone, My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted User. I’m a student in Germany, majoring in Mathematics with a focus on Algebraic Topology. Many thanks to Johannes Löthberg who is sponsoring my TU application. I’ve been using Linux since late 2013,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Sorry, there was a fluke with enigmail that prevented a corrected signature. This one should however work. Alad Am 10/09/2017 um 15:16 schrieb Alad Wenter via aur-general: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > User. I

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:55:16PM +, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 09/10/2017 09:16 AM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > My name is Alad Wenter, and I would like to apply for a position as Trusted > > User. I’m a student in Germa

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Am 10/09/2017 um 23:56 schrieb Eli Schwartz: > On 09/10/2017 04:08 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: >>> aurutils/aurutils-git: >>> - uses the ISC ("custom:ISC") license, which is not a common license >>> (`pacman -Ql licenses`)and must therefore b

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

Am 10/09/2017 um 15:25 schrieb Alad Wenter via aur-general: > Sorry, there was a fluke with enigmail that prevented a corrected > signature. This one should however work. > > Alad > > The issue was that I signed both the message and attachment (my public key) in enigmail,

Re: [aur-general] Can my AUR package be reinstated?

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:17:45AM +, Adam Fontenot via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > The TU "alad" deleted my package, firefox-clean, from the AUR. I'm > assuming this is a mistake, but I can't contact alad directly because > their email is hidden on their profile. At first glance, it may

Re: [aur-general] Can my AUR package be reinstated?

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 04:02:00AM +, Adam Fontenot via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:19:34PM +0000, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:17:45AM +, Adam Fontenot via aur-general > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > &g

Re: [aur-general] We need help for a Package

> Testbird71 hat am 30. November 2017 um 17:01 geschrieben: > > (...) This post deserves this year's award for Most Messed-up Mail. ... the "A" in "AUR" stands for Arch. Manjaro is not Arch - if packages which otherwise work fine in Arch don't work in Manjaro, it's a

Re: [aur-general] TU application for Eli Schwartz

> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 13. Dezember > 2017 um 13:57 geschrieben: > > > Hello, all. :) > > My name is Eli Schwartz, better known as eschwartz on the forums[1], > AUR[2], bugtracker[3], wiki[4] general mailing lists, IRC, and generally > everywhere I

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:59:49AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > Seems fairly popular, plus it's useful to lock the screen on sleep > without systemd. I realize I'm somewhat late with this response, but upstream hasn't updated their project in years and the release has

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:26:33PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > The 100%-cpu issue should be fixed upstream on master (and thus also in the > -git package). > I've mentioned this on the wiki: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Power_management#xss-lock > Since that's a fairly

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Bennett Piater wrote: > This doesn't take care of locking on inactivity though, which is the other > major feature of xss-lock. > That said, a short implementation may look as follows:

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > Alad Wenter via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> writes: > > > If you use polkit and acpid, a "simple" alternative is to use > > systemd-inhibit, and run actions based on acpid

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Bennett Piater wrote: > This doesn't take care of locking on inactivity though, which is the other > major feature of xss-lock. > Except, as noted, that "major feature" doesn't work at all... Alad signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:32:46PM +0100, Bennett Piater wrote: > > > On 01/18/2018 09:25 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Bennett Piater wrote: > > Except, as noted, that "major feature" doesn't work at all...

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:23:08PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I'm writing to apply to be a TU, and Alad Wenter has kindly agreed to > be my sponsor. > I hereby confirm my sponsorship. Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. Thanks! Alad signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG signature. > > My mistake! Here's my official, signed reply. > The discussion period is o

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:25:05AM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 02/09/2018 01:00 AM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post > > as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:01:34PM +, John Lane wrote: > Hi, I got the below sent to me regarding a pkg I have in AUR. > > I guess it should be deleted as per the request. I believe that requires > a mail to this list? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gsmartcontrol-svn/ > > I verified

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:50:23PM +0100, Marcin Wieczorek wrote: > Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general writes: > > I'm not sure if, in this case, he would need a sponsor or not. I don't > > think we need to amend the bylaws to add this special case for a returning > >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Ivy Foster

On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 12:12:44AM +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:53:07PM -0600, Ivy Foster wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2018, at 10:31 +0100, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > > Note: If possible please add a short reply with a GPG sign

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

> Doug Newgard via aur-general hat am 14. Februar > 2018 um 14:33 geschrieben: > > Getting feedback on the code doesn't have much do to with the existence of > this > package. Two totally different issues. Well, upstream disagrees. To quote his email again, "Could

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

> Doug Newgard via aur-general hat am 9. Februar > 2018 um 16:22 geschrieben: > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:13:37 -0200 > Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > > > I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this > > development package I

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

> Simon Doppler hat am 14. Februar 2018 um 15:46 geschrieben: > > > On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 15:29:29 CET Eli Schwartz via aur-general > wrote: > > > "Could you please remove this package? I keep getting bug reports for > > > it, but the thing is, the SVN version is not

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:58:57AM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > 2018-02-08 13:45 GMT-02:00 Alad Wenter via aur-general > <aur-general@archlinux.org>: > > It has 5 votes on AUR, so it doesn't look very popular on Arch. Typical > > guideline is at least 10 be

Re: [aur-general] TU for moving DDNet to community?

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:44:27PM -0200, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > Hello, > > DDNet is a very fun sidescrolling game, similar to Teeworlds (DDNet is > actually a mod of Teeworlds). Since Teeworlds's development is very > slow and DDNet's development is very active, a lot of players migrated >

Re: [aur-general] Rpc Info Order

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 08:57:54PM +, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote: > Yes there's a few easy ways around it, was just wondering if it's a > bug or not before making a bug report. > Where is it specified in what order the RPC output should be? If there is such a place and the behavior

Re: [aur-general] aurjson - Adding groups to the infos of a search

> I'm building a AUR wrapper and I would like to display the package > groups next to the search results when someone searches for a package > like pacman does it for official repos. > In the wiki [1] it says that the output of the aur rpc is just a list > of info request outputs. But when I'm

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März 2018 > um 22:16 geschrieben: > > Discussion period is over, time to cast your votes, everyone! > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=105 > I've cast my vote the moment I saw this email. Last time I didn't, I got an angry

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#10789] Merge Request for remarkable-webkit2gtk

> Mikael Blomstrand via aur-general hat am 4. März > 2018 um 02:33 geschrieben: > > I was looking at AurJson the other day. It struck me that it would be a > really nice feature to be able to search for packages by the `provides` tag. > Similarly it would be an

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

For the record, I confirm that I support Maxim's application. I referred him to Morten as my time schedule did not allow sponsoring a new candidate. Best of luck! Alad signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new applications per month. That makes a thorough review difficult. Considering the positive experiences of the sponsor, it would be a shame to let a voting period

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/11/18 8:30 PM, Alad Wenter wrote: > Since the discussion period is about to end without much discussion... > > Right now the rate of new applications is very high - about 2 new > applications per month. That makes a thorough review difficult. > > Considering the positive experiences of the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

There's no positive or negative reply to it, because there's still questions left unanswered. 1. Coderobe's comment on use of sed in iup went disregarded. [1] (It appears the https source was addressed, and Daurnimator commented on the static linking.) 2. We don't know why luarocks would be a

Re: [aur-general] Account suspension

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:10:23 + Gonçalo Pereira wrote: > I don't mean to ofend anyone. It's sad. I just want to help... and > improving the AUR :( You should have thought about that before acting the way you did. Now move on with life. Alad > > On 13/01/19 21:46, Alad We

Re: [aur-general] Account suspension

aur-requests. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2019-January/029146.html Alad On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:24:00 + Gonçalo Pereira wrote: > What's the ML Threads? > > On 13/01/19 21:23, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > > On 1/13/19 9:22 PM, Gonçalo Pereira wrote: > >> Hey,

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Besides what has been outlined by Eli and JereBear, there are some more general remarks I would like to make. I'll start with the first (or "second", since the actual first application was a single sentence) application email. [1] > I think dpkg package manage is too complicated (...) I think

Re: [aur-general] Purge of packages orphaned, out-of-date, and last updated before 2017

Not too long after I became TU I deleted something of ~2000 packages, based on similar "criteria" and after seeing no "objections" on IRC after a while. After the deed was done I got emails, angry shouting on IRC and complaints for the following 6 months on BBS and other places. If you want

Re: [aur-general] Purge of packages orphaned, out-of-date, and last updated before 2017

On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 08:50:48PM -0500, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > Quoting David Runge (2019-01-26 05:23:37) > > On 2019-01-26 08:01:46 (+0100), Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > > > Not too long after I became TU I deleted something of ~2000 packages, >

Re: [aur-general] feedback for new package

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:29:57AM +, Martin Wilson wrote: > I've put together a package for upload to the AUR, but since it's my first, > I would like to know if there are any problems with it: > > https://github.com/martin3141/tarquin_arch > You should quote "$pkgdir" and "$srcdir" as both

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

I reached out to Alad sometime in between, but he never responded to my profile review request; While I don't claim to be the most apt in responding to emails, I see no Jean Lucas orj...@4ray.co in my mailbox. I guess that's why I did not respond then. That said, I think its a bit unfair to

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

On 8/30/19 9:09 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote: Oh hell, AUR declines history rewrites. I'm deeply sorry, folks ☹ I didn't think that this is irreversible (this is git, it's about history rewriting!). How can I fix what I've done? You can't. It also doesn't matter because I've accepted the

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 9/5/19 3:21 PM, Aaron Laws via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >>> Sergej already confirmed sponsorship. >> I read his reply twice, but I could not see a confirmation of sponsorship. >> Sergej,

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote: > Hi all, > > my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the > AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User > under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter. > I hereby confirm my

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

On 9/5/19 5:29 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the >> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux

Re: [aur-general] TU application: kpcyrd

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:30:05PM +, kpcyrd wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:21:42PM -0400, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general > wrote: > > Package review: > > > > narnia, tr1pd{,-git}: Could use `--locked`? > > > > python-fints: Missing `--skip-build` in `package()`. > > Thanks, I've

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

> Vote is now over too, and the results are in: > > Yes: 42 > No: 1 > Abstain: 8 > > So, with a participation of 91.07% that meets the quorum, I can now say > “Welcome in the team!”. > > You can now proceed with >

Re: [aur-general] aur client

Excerpts from Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general's message of November 2, 2019 10:04 pm: > Command renamed from "aur" to "box", for preventing conflicts with > "aur.1" at aurutils. > Sounds reasonable. Thanks. Alad > Box is meant to be a short form for "package definition". So a command

Re: [aur-general] Updating AUR versions server side

Excerpts from Jeremy Audet via aur-general's message of November 5, 2019 7:51 pm: >> > What if regular, non development, AUR packages were tested server side >> > for new versions? >> > Won't that make more sense than the maintainer having to run pkgver() >> > manually from time to time? >> >> We