e a reason to flood arch repositories with these
proprietary programs? In my opinion proprietary programs should be an
exception, not the norm.
Josef Miegl
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:58:06PM +0100, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> No, it is not, and please don't expect this of volunteers.
Right, I don't expect that from AUR volunteers, but that doesn't mean the AUR
shouldn't be taken seriously. If the maitainer has not interest in updating
and seeking out
Hello Drew,
I am a fan of your work on Sway and wlroots, but some of your statements left
me pretty disappointed.
>For the AUR I don't keep up with upstream releases, I just wait for
>someone to mark the package as outdated. For Alpine Linux I use a
>combination of subscribing to the upstream
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will update all my packages
accordingly :)
Josef Miegl
I've been trying to improve my AUR packages for the last few days. I'm
still a beginner in package maintaining so I would like to have some
feedback on some of my PKGBUILDs. I would love to hear everything that
is wrong about them. Thanks!
# Maintainer: Josef Miegl
pkgname=osmo-bsc-git
pkgver
