Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 03:17:12PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I have been less active in Arch for some time. I'm involved in many other > projects that end up taking lots of time, and as a result I don't have the > required time / energy / interest for Arch anymore. When my last

Re: [aur-general] TU application - orhun

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 08:03:45PM +0300, orhun via aur-general wrote: > Dear Arch Linux Trusted Users & Developers, Yo! > The intent of this mail is to apply for the role of Trusted User with the > confirmation/sponsorship of Sven-Hendrik Haase and Levente Polyak. Good luck with the

Re: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:55:21AM +0100, Morten Linderud wrote: > Hi everyone! > > A little bit overdue but the discussion period is over. I apologize for > missing > the deadline by a day. > > > I have started the voting > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=126 The voting has ended and the

Re: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne

Hi everyone! A little bit overdue but the discussion period is over. I apologize for missing the deadline by a day. I have started the voting https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=126 -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Evgeniy 'arcanis' Alekseev

The vote are in and the results: Yes: 43 No: 2 Abstain: 6 Total: 51 Participation: 87.93% The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number of "Yes", than "No" votes. This means Evgeniy Alekseev is no longer a Trusted User. On behalf of the Arch team I would like to thank Evgeniy for

Re: [aur-general] TU application - rgacogne

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 08:52:37AM +0100, Remi Gacogne via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > My name is Remi Gacogne, and I hereby apply to join the Trusted Users > team, kindly sponsored by Levente Polyak and Morten Linderud. I confirm my sponsorship of Remi :) I have known Remi since

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Evgeniy 'arcanis' Alekseev

On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 06:48:31PM +0100, Morten Linderud wrote: > Yo, > > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of > Evgeniy Alekseev, also known as 'arcanis' on the grounds of 'Special Removal > of > an Inactive TU' [1]. > > Evgeniy's last action on archweb

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Evgeniy 'arcanis' Alekseev

On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 02:38:59PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > > The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion > > period, in which Evgeniy can state his case. > > 7 days is the discussion period for a normal removal vote; the > discussion period for one

[aur-general] TU removal: Evgeniy 'arcanis' Alekseev

Yo, I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Evgeniy Alekseev, also known as 'arcanis' on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Evgeniy's last action on archweb was '2019-12-25 20:41', and the last vote they participated in was the removal of

Re: [aur-general] TU application - bastelfreak

On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Tim Meusel via aur-general wrote: > Hi! Yo! > Besides working on open source projects, I spent a huge amount of time > for my second passion, cooking and doing BBQ. From time to time I also > attend ice hockey events as visitor but also as hobby-referee

Re: [aur-general] TU application - bastelfreak

On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 05:43:11PM +0200, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:39:41 +0200 > Tim Meusel via aur-general wrote: > > > I talked to shibumi and hashworks in the past days, both reviewed the > > packages and agreed to sponsor my application. > > I

Re: [aur-general] TU application - bastelfreak

On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 03:49:28PM +, Kusoneko wrote: > On October 18, 2020 3:39:41 PM UTC, Tim Meusel via aur-general > wrote: > >Hi! > >snip > > Not a TU, but I noticed that the GPG key that signed this application is > expired according to my mail client. It's not extended on the

Re: [aur-general] AUR request notify mails

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Michael Straube via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > in the past, when I filed an AUR request, I got a copy (via CC ?, not > sure..) of the request send to my email account. > > Today I opened >

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote: > The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't get > updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess some > of them can be safely dropped without anyone noticing (I'm looking

Re: [aur-general] Packaging a go application

On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 02:37:13PM +0200, Rhys Perry via aur-general wrote: > Hi, I am currently trying to package an application for use in the aur. The > problem I am having is the install() section. The only thing i need to be done > is for the package to move '$srcdir/$_gitname/fathom' into

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 06:00:32PM +0300, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > I understand we have standards and requirements and suggestions and best > practices and so on, but for the Arch User Repository - is Lone_Wolf not > allowed to make a package called >

Re: [aur-general] Trusted user application: Drew DeVault

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 06:40:13PM -0700, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > Here's a PKGBUILD review: Some additional points! > ## madonctl * This package needs to drop `go get` as we have vendored deps. > ## python-activipy-git * "v" should be removed from the pkgver as we are dealing

Re: [aur-general] Handling coincidental name collisions

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 02:49:33PM +0100, Xyne wrote: > The discussion is important because we need to have a general consensus on > deletion criteria. Rogue TUs can't be allowed to roam the AUR deleting > whatever > they personally don't find useful on a given day. `Make sure the package you

Re: [aur-general] TU Application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0800, Metal A-wing wrote: > I started using Ubuntu in high school. > And I use Debian at university. > In 2017, I started Archlinux > > I also tried other distributions. linux mint, deepin linux, gentoo, centos This seems fairly rushed. The AUR registration

Re: [aur-general] Legal question - Arch Linux trademark on goodies - Transparency

Im unsure why this was posted to aur-general and not arch-general? Probably wrong ML. On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:16:09PM +0100, William Gathoye wrote: > When someone is donating money to the project, who is receiving it? How > can we have transparency about the IN/OUT of the treasury (server

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

We can also add a more explicit warning in the package guidelines. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_package_guidelines#Check -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Exact purpose of check()

On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > There is a bit of debate at the borgmatic package ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/borgmatic) about what check() should do. > The upstream borgmatic project uses tox to execute its tests. tox creates > an

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

Yo! The vote is over and the results are inn! Yes: 22 No: 15 Abstain: 12 Participation:89.09% Congratulations! I have updated the AUR account. Please follow the TODO and poke me with any questions you have :)

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:20:22PM +0100, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > As of the recent discussions; We could try the "co-sponsorship" before the > voting process? Say one or two people confirm they think the voting process > should be continued after the d

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:03:33AM +1100, Daurnimator wrote: > I'm applying to be a Trusted User; Foxboron has kindly sponsored me and has > been mentoring me on the specifics over the last couple of months. Yo! I confirm my sponsorship of Daurnimator! Because of the recent discussion regarding

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! Yes: 33 No: 10 Abstain: 9 Participation: 100%(!!!) Congratulations! I have update your AUR account :) Pleaase follow the TODO and poke me for any questions you have going forward!

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel M. Capella

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:51:31PM -0500, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > Quoting Eli Schwartz via aur-general (2018-11-15 00:52:50) > > On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > > > Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) > > >> - tests are

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Yo! The discussion period is over and the voting has begun! Great review session everyone, and I hope we can see more things like that in the future :) https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=113 -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 01:29:31PM -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > ### TU council I'll summarize this with: I'm unsure. This feels like smacking a social problem with a hammer. I'm also afraid of power imbalance as Ivy have noted. I think we should refocus this effort into

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Yo! On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:16:46PM +0100, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: > My name is Maxim Baz, and with Morten Linderud (Foxboron) as my sponsor > (who I was referred to by Alad Wenter) I'm applying to become a Trusted User. I confirm my sponsorship of Maxim. Let the discussion period

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Konstantin Gizdov

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 04:02:40PM -0400, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: > It's upsetting and embarrassing that the only staffer to stand against this > behavior directly in the ML is the applicant's sponsor. This disrespectful > behavior occurs all the time. Can we enforce our Code of

Re: [aur-general] Critique my pkgbuild

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:52:49PM +0200, Tinu Weber wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 15:48:31 +0200, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > > > makedepends=('make') > > > > `make` is present in `base-devel` thus shouldn't be a listed dependency. > > Unsure &g

Re: [aur-general] Critique my pkgbuild

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:34:25PM +, Ethan Rakoff wrote: > # Maintainer: Ethan Rakoff > > pkgname=threemawebqt Needs to have a -git suffix as it builds from a git source and is thus a VCS package. > pkgver=0.1 You need a pkgver() function as this is an VCS package. Since you don't have

Re: [aur-general] Attempting to update upwork-beta, and hit a head-scratcher

I have removed the suspension. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] acroread package compromised

These where the compromised packages and their package versions: * acrored 9.5.5-8 * balz 1.20-3 * minergate 8.1-2 -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD for Automatic Arch System Maintenance

On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 02:47:16PM -0400, Michael Dobachesky via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have been working on a package that automatically does Arch Linux system > maintenance tasks like updating, cleaning, error checking, etc. > It has really helped me out and I am hoping

Re: [aur-general] Delete spam comment/account from aur

On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:36:54AM +0200, Maxim Andersson via aur-general wrote: > Regarding this page > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-comment-fetcher-git/ > > Could the comment from 2018-06-06 (and maybe spammer-account?) please > be deleted. As a headsup. I removed the comment and

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:03:02AM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > I've stopped using Arch ever since I've switched to GuixSD[1] (a > functional-oriented distribution focusing on reproducible builds and > completely custimizable in Guile Scheme) and it's now quite clear that >

Re: [aur-general] Basilisk pkgbuild is facing a trademark violation?

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:23:52PM +0200, Fabio Loli via aur-general wrote: > Mattatobin, of which you can read here > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > Have made this (edited) comment in the AUR webpage asking for removal > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/basilisk >

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 07:09:06PM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > Morten Linderud writes: > > > What i have done now is to launch a second gpg-agent that only > > provides an -extra socket with no caching what so ever. > > I thought of something along those lines.

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 06:09:27PM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > > Use the `ignore-cache-for-signing` option in gpg-agent. Unsure if you can > > enable > > this only for connections to soyuz. > > But that's only for signing, so that won't do if I have subkeys used for > other purposes

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 05:58:11PM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > > What's the best practice to disable password caching? Set the timeout > to zero? > > Does anyone know if it's possible to have have a zero-timeout when on > soyuz while having another timeout time locally?

Re: [aur-general] Build packages without Arch on pkgbuild.com

On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 11:53:08AM +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general wrote: > To perform the complete operation on soyuz, we need to forward the > gpg-socket (and the SSH socket if different) to soyuz, which defeats the PGP > / Web of Trust security model: for a person with root access to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:21:39PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 03/07/2018 05:15 PM, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote: > >> Eli Schwartz via aur-general hat am 7. März > >> 2018 um 22:16 geschrieben: > >> > >> Discussion period is over, time to cast

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Robin Broda

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Robin 'coderobe' Broda, born in '99, and I'm writing to become a > Trusted User. > > [SNIP] Yo Robin! Super happy to see you applying for TU, and I appreciate the support you have been doing on IRC.