[aur-general] Removal request: xorriso , xorriso-tcltk

2013-10-23 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, please remove AUR packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ Both are outdated, overlapping with Archlinux package libisoburn, and already have been orphaned more than a month ago. Andreas Radke reports in

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, The proposal to augment package libisoburn is in the bug tracker since a month. (See https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931 ) I am thankful towards the package maintainer of libisoburn for keeping it up to date. So i refrain from bothering him more. Now what to do about the two outdated and

[aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, six weeks ago, i asked for advise how to deal with the outdated AUR package of my program xorriso, which overwrites the executables of the properly maintained package https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=libisoburn On advise of this list, i later posted comments to

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Martti Kühne wrote: Technically, 2 weeks after writing the email you could have come here to ask for orphaning. I wanted (and still want) to create a good relationship between the package maintainer and me as upstream. But vacation time is over now. So i assume she/he is busy with other

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Disowned both of them. They're all yours. I found https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Maintaining_packages If you maintain a package and want to update the PKGBUILD for your package just resubmit it. But https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Creating_Packages

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Why don't we simply drop xorriso and xorriso-tcltk from the AUR I suspect that the AUR package was requested by some user of GRUB. If xorriso gets removed, then it might be requested again, and some friendly unaware person might re-introduce it. and add

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Lukas Fleischer wrote: The provides directive makes sure that people can put something like depends=('xorriso') in their PKGBUILDs and it will automatically use libisoburn instead -- Will this also help users who look for xorriso and do not expect to find it in a library package ?

Re: [aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn

2013-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i now filed task 36931 [1] on the bug tracker. If you see opportunities to improve it, then please do. Many thanks for now to Lukas and Martti. Have a nice day :) Thomas [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931

[aur-general] Upstream seeking contact with package maintainer

2013-08-02 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i am the developer of xorriso, and first want to thank you for including it and its frontend script xorriso-tcltk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ Is there a mail address by which i could reach the maintainer of those two