> > Well, I think it should be the other way around, you first mentor someone
>
> and look with them into their packages and then decided about sponsorship.
>
> That's your opinion, and here's mine: I don't think that's important. If a
> candidate looks promising and there is an intention to both
I'm reading carefully through the TU bylaws, and I think they need some
clarifications:
> The addition of a TU may occur at any time.
>
> In order to become a TU, one must first find two sponsoring TUs following
the guidelines outlined below, and arrange privately with them
> to announce their
On 9/5/19 3:21 PM, Aaron Laws via aur-general wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>>> Sergej already confirmed sponsorship.
>> I read his reply twice, but I could not see a confirmation of sponsorship.
>> Sergej,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > Sergej already confirmed sponsorship.
>
> I read his reply twice, but I could not see a confirmation of sponsorship.
> Sergej, could you please clarify?
>
...
> Have Sergej confirmed his
Hi,
Giancarlo wrote:
> Well, I think it should be the other way around, you first mentor someone
and look with them into their packages and then decided about sponsorship.
That's your opinion, and here's mine: I don't think that's important. If a
candidate looks promising and there is an
On September 4, 2019 4:37:42 PM GMT+02:00, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general
wrote:
>Em setembro 4, 2019 9:54 Alexander Rødseth via aur-general escreveu:
>>
>> I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he
>found
>> another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent
Em setembro 4, 2019 9:54 Alexander Rødseth via aur-general escreveu:
I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he found
another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent his application without
any mentoring on my part.
Well, I think it should be the other way
Hello,
Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation followed by a period of
having little spare time, with regards to work and family.
I did agree to sponsor the TU application of Jean Lucas, provided he found
another sponsor, but was not aware that he had sent his application without
any
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 9:39:37 AM EDT Xyne wrote:
> The lackadaisical approach to sponsorship is one of the main reasons that
> we've moved to a system with two sponsors. Maybe I missed the joke, but
> having nothing against someone and wanting to see a particular package in
> community is
On 2019-08-19 16:49 +0300
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
>Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
>>
>> Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
>> this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both sponsors
>> telling us they actively sponsor Jean's application.
Em agosto 20, 2019 13:16 Jean Lucas via aur-general escreveu:
Hi Bert, and thank you!
My (latest) key can be found at
https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=jean%404ray.co and
https://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?search=jean%404ray.co=on=vindex
(as well as the servers SKS Keyservers
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 11:01 +0200, Bert Peters via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Jean Lucas,
>
> I've been reading your TU application and I wish you the best of
> luck.
> However, I can't seem to find the GPG key you're using on any
> keyservers. Did you happen to forget to submit it somewhere?
>
>
Hi Jean Lucas,
I've been reading your TU application and I wish you the best of luck.
However, I can't seem to find the GPG key you're using on any
keyservers. Did you happen to forget to submit it somewhere?
Best,
Bert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 16:49 +0300, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> > Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it.
> > All
> > this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both
> > sponsors
> > telling us they actively sponsor
Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
>
> Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
> this discussion is kind of pointless until we hear from both sponsors
> telling us they actively sponsor Jean's application. Then the discussion
> period can begin.
Ok, I am
Em agosto 19, 2019 9:05 Sergej Pupykin escreveu:
I have nothing against this application. I use parsedmarc package
(slightly modified for my needs) which maintained by Jean.
Having nothing against is not the same as actively sponsoring it. All
this discussion is kind of pointless until we
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
I have nothing against this application. I use parsedmarc package
(slightly modified for my
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 01:14 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/18/19 12:26 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> > > > - This appears to me it's a -bin package
> > >
> > > Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package
> > > on the
> > > NPM registry.
> > >
> >
> >
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 22:51 -0400, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a
> > great OS!
>
> Always happy to help! :)
>
> It's customary to
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 17:56 +0200, David Runge wrote:
> On 2019-08-16 17:10:41 (-0400), Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > I would definitely be willing to very politely ask the five
> > respective
> > companies for redistribution permissions for Arch Linux.
> In the case of reaper, I've
On 2019-08-16 17:10:41 (-0400), Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> I would definitely be willing to very politely ask the five respective
> companies for redistribution permissions for Arch Linux.
In the case of reaper, I've already been in contact with Cockos to try
and move that to [community]
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 23:46 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/17/19 2:49 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > That said, I think its a bit unfair to say that I went off and
> > found
> > another sponsor without batting an eye - asking Alexander and
> > Sergej
> > seemed
On 8/18/19 12:26 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
>>> - This appears to me it's a -bin package
>>
>> Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package on the
>> NPM registry.
>>
>
> well, judging from the lack of build() I'd assume so. I'm not too
> familiar with npm, but if t is
> > - This appears to me it's a -bin package
>
> Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package on the
> NPM registry.
>
well, judging from the lack of build() I'd assume so. I'm not too
familiar with npm, but if t is running build commands (as you concede
down in the email it
On 8/17/19 10:51 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a great OS!
>
> Always happy to help! :)
>
> It's customary to review
On 8/17/19 2:49 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> That said, I think its a bit unfair to say that I went off and found
> another sponsor without batting an eye - asking Alexander and Sergej
> seemed appropriate as they'd both adopted one of my packages, I had
> worked with you to resolve
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a great OS!
Always happy to help! :)
It's customary to review PKGBUILDS for new applicants. This is somewhat
of a quick/cursory review over
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 02:12 +0200, Alad Wenter via aur-general wrote:
> > I reached out to Alad sometime in between, but he never responded
> > to my profile review request;
>
> While I don't claim to be the most apt in responding to emails, I see
> no Jean Lucas orj...@4ray.co in my mailbox.
>
I reached out to Alad sometime in between, but he never responded to my profile review request;
While I don't claim to be the most apt in responding to emails, I see no Jean
Lucas orj...@4ray.co in my mailbox.
I guess that's why I did not respond then.
That said, I think its a bit unfair to
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 21:58 +0200, Robin Broda wrote:
> On 8/17/19 8:49 PM, Jean Lucas wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> >
> > On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general
> > wrote:
> > > On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > > > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending
On 8/17/19 8:49 PM, Jean Lucas wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
>> On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
>>> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
>>> candidacy
>>> for Trusted User member. As per
Hi Robin,
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:13 +0200, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
> > candidacy
> > for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm
On 8/16/19 9:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
How many TUs did you ask for
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 02:00 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general
wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:35, Josef Miegl wrote:
>
> > On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-
> > general" <
> > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:35, Josef Miegl wrote:
> On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-general" <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> >anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are
> >proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think
On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-general"
wrote:
>anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are
>proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think that you
>can legally distribute them
Even if we could, is there a reason to flood
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 17:47 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 8/16/19 3:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my
> > candidacy
> > for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> >
On 8/16/19 3:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
> for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
> sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
>
> I've been an Arch Linux
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 22:40 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:35, Oscar wrote:
>
> > I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't
> > think they
> > will allow redistribution of binaries.
> >
> > They even dropped the official Ubuntu
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 22:45 +0200, Levente Polyak via aur-general
wrote:
> On August 16, 2019 9:19:56 PM GMT+02:00, Jean Lucas via aur-general <
> aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> > If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> > following packages (all having over 10
On August 16, 2019 9:19:56 PM GMT+02:00, Jean Lucas via aur-general
wrote:
>
>If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
>following packages (all having over 10 votes in the AUR) from the AUR
>into [community]:
>
>... , downgrade,...
>
It's never been official in the
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:35, Oscar wrote:
> I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't think they
> will allow redistribution of binaries.
>
> They even dropped the official Ubuntu packages in favor of their custom
> installers. And honestly it makes more sense to do it
I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't think they
will allow redistribution of binaries.
They even dropped the official Ubuntu packages in favor of their custom
installers. And honestly it makes more sense to do it this way because the
engine is a big self contained blob
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:06 Balló György via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> 2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general
> ezt írta:
> > If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> > following packages (all having over 10 votes
2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general
ezt írta:
> If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the
> following packages (all having over 10 votes in the AUR) from the AUR
> into [community]:
>
> anydesk, downgrade, exercism, flutter, godot, itch,
Hi all,
My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy
for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being
sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin.
I've been an Arch Linux user since around a little before I registered
my AUR account (January
On 11/16/18 08:11pm, David Runge wrote:
The results are in (the vote ended nearly an hour ago)!
Thank you all.
To those that voted 'No': Feel free to send me a message with your
feedback. Your concerns would be a valuable asset for me to keep in
mind.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 2018-11-09 19:05:58 (+0100), David Runge wrote:
> Let's vote! :)
The results are in (the vote ended nearly an hour ago)!
Yes: 26
No:9
Abstain: 12
Participation 90.38% (come on, don't drop the ball on this! ;-))
I have just updated your account status in
On 2018-11-09 13:11:19 (-0500), Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> This definitely lists the right time period:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_addition_of_a_tu
Yep, sorry, that was just a brainfart from my side. ;-)
Here's the link to the vote btw:
On 11/9/18 1:05 PM, David Runge wrote:
> As the (newish, but still not updated [1]) discussion period of 14 days
> is now over, I have started the vote.
>
> Thanks again to all reviewers and active TUs in this discussion period!
> I think Brett will make a good TU!
>
> Let's vote! :)
>
> [1]
>
As the (newish, but still not updated [1]) discussion period of 14 days
is now over, I have started the vote.
Thanks again to all reviewers and active TUs in this discussion period!
I think Brett will make a good TU!
Let's vote! :)
[1]
Le 08/11/2018 à 04:34, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general a écrit :
>>>- I noticed that you didn't add a LICENSE file for this package.
>> Artistic2.0 is a uncommonly used common license!
>> (/usr/share/licenses/common/Artistic2.0/license.txt)
>>
>>
> Yes, my bad. I was told about this on
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:04:43PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> Because their tarballs used to be insane. And giving you the tarball for
> master is a regression they fixed, not an API they dropped. :p
It's an API url they dropped. They moved it around and instead of 404'd
they
On 11/7/18 10:44 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> It happened to me with gitlab and their releases url, which started
> defaulting to "I don't recognize this branch parameter, so here's the
> tarball for master"[1]
Yes, gitlab is prone to bugs like this. :p
gitlab also includes
> > - I noticed that you didn't add a LICENSE file for this package.
>
> This checks out, Artistic2.0 is a common license.
Yes, my bad. For this and the rest of the licenses below I assumed it
was the same case as MIT and such.
> > - hib-dlagent:
> > - I see that you backported a patch
> >- I marked the package as out-of-date, as there appears to be a new
> > version (3.1.4.15) as of almost two months ago.
>
> Long story short, that was pretty much exactly during the time when I
> accidentally clobbered my urlwatch file. Thanks for bringing that up to me.
>
> >- I
On 11/07/18 09:28pm, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
Hello Brett.
I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some
feedback:
- ags:
- it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile
definition, although it appears that the Makefile itself lets you
On 11/7/18 9:28 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote:
> Hello Brett.
>
> I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some
> feedback:
>
> - ags:
> - it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile
> definition, although it appears that the
Hello Brett.
I took some time to randomly sample your PKGBUILDs and give some
feedback:
- ags:
- it appears that you use sed to change CFLAGS in the makefile
definition, although it appears that the Makefile itself lets you
overwrite them. I'd advice trying to use native tooling
On 07 Nov 2018, at 5:41 pm -0700, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> > - don't think pkgdesc should ever end with a dot
> The descriptions are often sentences, so would it not reason to end them
> with a period?
In the case of
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:45:01PM -0700, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> > creeper-world2
>
> I've had two AUR requests queued up for some time now; deleting this package
> is one of them.
Quick update: I addressed your
On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
creeper-world2
I've had two AUR requests queued up for some time now; deleting this
package is one of them.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
some small questions and hints first:
I'm nearly done with following your excellent suggestions but I have
responses and questions.
It looks like several packages have different issues preventing to build
in clean chrooted
On 11/05/18 07:48pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
Hi Brett,
some small questions and hints first:
Thank you for such a thorough vetting, Levente!
I'm fixing these ASAP.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 11/5/18 1:48 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> gnome-xcf-thumbnailer
> - prepare() shall never package into $pkgdir
That's a write error, makepkg explicitly runs chmod on "${pkgdir}" in
order to strip read/write permissions and forbid you from touching it
before package() is run:
On 10/25/18 4:26 PM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> I am being sponsored by dvzrv.
>
> I've been working in the AUR since 2014 as 'Ainola'.
Hi Brett,
some small questions and hints first:
It looks like several packages have different issues preventing to build
in clean chrooted
On 10/26/18 08:44pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
can you please fix this and make your gpg key available somewhere?
I've pushed 0F8E620A up.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Brett
On 10/25/18 8:22 PM, David Runge wrote:
>
> P.S.: As you've just created a new pgp key pair for your address, please
> make sure to upload the pubkey to the keyservers!
>
can you please fix this and make your gpg key available somewhere?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 10/25/18 10:22pm, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
What kind of tasks/roles do you handle for LibreOffice in the infrastructure
team?
I've been working with the team for a few years now. I'd say the
majority of my work would be converting the legacy, manually-configured
environments to Saltstack
On 10/25/18 at 08:26am, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> I am being sponsored by dvzrv.
>
> I've been working in the AUR since 2014 as 'Ainola'. I've had a few of my
> packages adopted into [community], such as gnome-mpv, csound, and qutecsound
> (the latter two being adopted by dvzrv).
>
On 2018-10-25 08:26:11 (-0600), Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> I am being sponsored by dvzrv.
I hereby ACK that and apologize for the confusion the last time (again).
> I would like to get valuable tools promoted into [community], such as
> residualvm or the 'pass' plasmoid (after
I am being sponsored by dvzrv.
I've been working in the AUR since 2014 as 'Ainola'. I've had a few of
my packages adopted into [community], such as gnome-mpv, csound, and
qutecsound (the latter two being adopted by dvzrv).
I am also an active contributor to the LibreOffice infrastructure
72 matches
Mail list logo
