On 3/1/23 13:55, Robin Candau wrote:
Thanks for adopting a more comprehensive and helping point of view.
Once again, it was more about the form than the initial goal. Help is always
appreciated :)
Honestly, I was angry of being kicked twice in a row (deletion + suspension).
But it does not
Thanks for adopting a more comprehensive and helping point of view.
Once again, it was more about the form than the initial goal. Help is
always appreciated :)
Your AUR account is un-suspended.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
On 3/1/23 12:42, Robin Candau wrote:
Identifying not complying packages is surely helpful /if done properly/, but certainly
not in that form. Once again, while we appreciate your will to help, no one asked or
expected you going in such a hunt and reporting that much packages at once with the
Hi all,
If I might intervene, I have something to add. I'm not TU, but I
maintain several packages in AUR. It's not too difficult. But the most
challenging part of this task is dealing with user requests: if it's
just an update request, it's more or less straightforward. But in all
other cases, I
Am 28.02.23 um 23:51 schrieb irecca@gmail.com:
Or there are no rules and TUs actually do what they want?
Simply put, yes. Actually the project is run by a club of people,
called Arch-devs. It is their project, not yours. Although they
admit new members, and work partially in public,
On 3/1/23 17:24, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
You filled ~ 50 requests in X minutes with just "Not allowed by AUR submission
guidelines". Without further detail about what is wrong with the package causing the
TU's to have to figure out what this request is about.
About 20 of that packages were
Le 01/03/2023 à 12:16, irecca@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3/1/23 10:30, Oskar Roesler wrote:
The TU's aren't judges in criminal court. It's totally ok and
beneficial if they apply some pragmatism and common sense. Hell, even
real court judges are allowed to vary in their decisionmaking. No,
Hey,
On 01/03/2023 12:16, irecca@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/1/23 10:30, Oskar Roesler wrote:
The TU's aren't judges in criminal court. It's totally ok and
beneficial if they apply some pragmatism and common sense. Hell, even
real court judges are allowed to vary in their decisionmaking. No,
On 3/1/23 10:30, Oskar Roesler wrote:
The TU's aren't judges in criminal court. It's totally ok and beneficial if
they apply some pragmatism and common sense. Hell, even real court judges are
allowed to vary in their decisionmaking. No, you're not discriminated because
they stopped your
