Our bi-yearly AUR Cleanup Day is coming up this Wednesday, but we
currently have a very large number of requests in the queue. The Trusted
Users will instead be having a spa day this year. If you feel the urge
to hunt down packages and file requests against them, knock yourself out.
https://wi
On 9/17/23 14:11, Jeremy Gust wrote:
or if the package can be built
Side note - not directed at your circumstance directly (because I have no idea
of the specifics), but...
I haven't flagged any packages as out of date, but If you have packages that
cannot be built any longer -- that is a b
I've been using FairEmail as my mobile client.
--
Kusoneko
GPG: https://kusoneko.moe/gpg.txt
https://kusoneko.moe
You're correct, my client default to reply to sender and cc the list for some
reason, I have to manually move the CC to To and remove the extra To in order
to reply to list. It's a bit of a pain in the ass to do for every single
message, hence why I usually don't bother. Most lists check the hea
On 9/17/23 15:23, Polarian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That is where Jeremy has replied all, which has sent one copy to you
> (which thunderbird automatically PGP encrypted), and one to the mailing
> list (which can not be PGP encrypted, so is sign-only).
>
> And no PGP signing is not mandatory unless it i
On 9/17/23 14:08, Polarian wrote:
> You only flag out of date when there is a new version
> (
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Flagging_packages_out-of-date
> ).
> If the flag is invalid, and an invalid orphan request is filed, it is
> completely fine because the package mai
Sep 17, 2023 17:06:16 Jeremy Gust :
>
> On 9/17/23 14:58, Kusoneko wrote:
>> Did you need to PGP encrypt a message to the list?
>>
>> --
>> Kusoneko
>> GPG: https://kusoneko.moe/gpg.txt
>> https://kusoneko.moe
> I only meant to reply to the list. Did something go through incorrectly? I'm
> a n
On 9/17/23 14:58, Kusoneko wrote:
> Did you need to PGP encrypt a message to the list?
>
> -- Kusoneko
> GPG: https://kusoneko.moe/gpg.txt
> https://kusoneko.moe
I only meant to reply to the list. Did something go through incorrectly? I'm a
novice with PGP, and I'm not aware of configuring Thund
Sep 17, 2023 16:55:19 Jeremy Gust :
> On 9/17/23 13:15, Kusoneko wrote:
>> The page to flag packages out of date specifically says it's for new updates
>> only not for bug reports and such.
>
> Yes, I had forgotten that.
>
> "Please do *not* use this form to report bugs. Use the package comment
On 9/17/23 13:15, Kusoneko wrote:
> The page to flag packages out of date specifically says it's for new updates
> only not for bug reports and such.
Yes, I had forgotten that.
"Please do not use this form to report bugs. Use the package comments instead.
Enter details on why the package is ou
Sep 17, 2023 15:12:00 Jeremy Gust :
> I have noticed several packages that have been flagged out of date, but they
> are not. The stated reason for the flag will be a problem the user has with
> the PKGBUILD that is unrelated to the program's version or if the package can
> be built. I did not
I have noticed several packages that have been flagged out of date, but they
are not. The stated reason for the flag will be a problem the user has with the
PKGBUILD that is unrelated to the program's version or if the package can be
built. I did not see anything in the wiki directly addressing
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 11:02 AM Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
> We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why this
> would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
>
> The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new
> versions?
>
This package isn't for Arc
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:30, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:21, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why
this would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to he
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:21, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why
this would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new
versions?
Le 17/09/2023 à 11:02, Tomaz Canabrava a écrit :
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why this
would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new
versions?
This package has multiple issues that makes
We have a few packages that are vim plugins, I don’t understand why this
would fail to be ok and other plugins, good.
The idea of a package is not to help users update and keep up with new
versions?
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 10:22 GoldenKnightFly <
afiqquraisyzulkarn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
Le 17/09/2023 à 10:21, GoldenKnightFly a écrit :
Hello, how is the `bun-termux` package even in AUR? It's literally a
package for Termux, not for Arch Linux.
Hello,
There's only a few trusted users/AUR moderator to watch for the 90K+ AUR
packages, this one just went under the radar...
Take a
Sep 17, 2023 04:22:40 GoldenKnightFly :
> Hello, how is the `bun-termux` package even in AUR? It's literally a package
> for Termux, not for Arch Linux. Take a look at the PKGBUILD:
>
> *mv* "${srcdir}/bun-linux-aarch64/bun" "${PREFIX}/bin/bun"
>
> It's literally pointing to Termux prefix w
Hello, how is the `bun-termux` package even in AUR? It's literally a
package for Termux, not for Arch Linux. Take a look at the PKGBUILD:
mv "${srcdir}/bun-linux-aarch64/bun" "${PREFIX}/bin/bun"
It's literally pointing to Termux prefix which is
`/data/data/com.termux/files/usr`.
20 matches
Mail list logo
