Hi,
You folks are correct that my bringing in those topics was a poor choice
in example. I did not want to initiate a debate about the ethics of any
such hate speech or the validity of the packages that use such language.
I just wanted to highlight that as a project the Arch community is
Le 27/09/2023 à 10:50, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 27/09/2023 à 06:18, a...@nullvoid.me a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
[...]
Now, regarding the examples you gave, while there are no clear
statement/guidelines about such packages on the AUR side (yet?), such
controversial topics are already pointed out
Le 27/09/2023 à 06:18, a...@nullvoid.me a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
I'm gonna start with I'm not a lawyer, and realistically the best answer
provided should be from a German (Arch project TOS list German laws to be
followed) or US (SPI nonprofit owns the domain and financial accounts) lawyer.
Once
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 04:18 +, a...@nullvoid.me wrote:
> For packages that may be immoral but legal, such as a package that
> changes everything to racial slurs, sexist, or vulgar language.
> I think it also should stay
