Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Xyne

2009-04-03 Thread xyne
for it. Thanks again. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Xyne

2009-04-03 Thread xyne
Gah, I have no idea how this ended up here. I was receiving the aur-general digest so I just changed the Subject when I replied. I've changed to the non-digest mode now so it should be fine in the future. *sigh* On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:23:59 +0200 xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Hi all

Re: [aur-general] OneSwarm in AUR wants to update itself

2009-04-04 Thread xyne
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 01:05:59 +0100 Mathias Burén mathias.bu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just created a package for OneSwarm [1] and uploaded it to the AUR [2]. The package works fine except that it has an auto-update feature, which of course doesn't work since the user does not have write

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Biru Ionut

2009-04-05 Thread xyne
packages present in the repos. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Submitting a new package (sunjdk)

2009-04-05 Thread xyne
such a package? If you're trying to achieve something specific then perhaps someone on the list can offer some suggestions of how to proceed. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Submitting a new package (sunjdk)

2009-04-05 Thread Xyne
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: The analogy doesn't carry very well here.. The kdemod repos 1) are not officially supported or endorsed, and 2) contain patches that change functionality. That being said, I wouldn't go so far as to entirely delete the package, I just think it's

Re: [aur-general] Maintainer vs Contributor tag let's find a solution ; )

2009-04-05 Thread Xyne
I think it makes the most sense to designate the person currently maintaining the package/PKGBUILD as the maintainer irrespective of that person's status in the community or the destination of the package/PKGBUILD. It immediately indicates to anyone looking at the PKGBUILD whom they should

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
Lucas Salies Brum lu...@archlinux.com.br wrote: I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 I wait 24 hours to drop it. Thanks, --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sarine.nl/gmpc/ - gmpc site http://gmpc.wikia.com/wiki/Gnome_Music_Player_Client

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Lucas Salies Brum lu...@archlinux.com.br wrote: I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 I wait 24 hours to drop it. Thanks, --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sarine.nl/gmpc/ - gmpc site http

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
and tried pacman -Ss vsound too. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] uploading binary packages / makepkg.conf files

2009-04-10 Thread Xyne
Actually, I'll probably just submit a feature request for a --config option. Done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14178

Re: [aur-general] Resigning as a TU

2009-04-11 Thread Xyne
to automatically build newer packages when new module versions are released. http://xyne.archlinux.ca/info/makerepo Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Watch list

2009-04-12 Thread Xyne
number, etc. If you want comments then I think you need to scrape the web page. If you just want to know when a new version of an AUR package is out, you could use paconky. Xyne

[aur-general] Questions from a new TU

2009-04-12 Thread Xyne
of tupkg but I didn't try it without communitypkg. 3) Is there any way to avoid re-uploading a package when changing the PKGBUILD if the changes have no effect on the built package (e.g. appending packages to the depends array)? Thanks, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Biru Ionut (wonder)

2009-04-17 Thread Xyne
Congrats! Kessia 'even' Pinheiro kessiapinhe...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Biru! Welcome to the ship! On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Hugo Doria wrote: And the voting period has ended. The results are: 17 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. So

Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn?

2009-04-25 Thread Xyne
persuasive associates: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=542194#p542194 /Xyne

Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn?

2009-04-26 Thread Xyne
compromise in absence of a direct link to the tarball. /Xyne

Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn?

2009-04-26 Thread Xyne
I thought the GPL asked you / forced you to host the files, which is quite different from just supporting it. Isn't this what the following bug was about? http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5355 From the GPLv2 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section

Re: [aur-general] When does a package need -svn?

2009-04-26 Thread Xyne
It is not. If you want to use b), you have to: - state it explicitely ; - keep a copy of the sources of every version you distribute in binary form for 3 years in case it is no longer available at its original location. I don't think it is a good thing, but that's what the GPL says. That's

Re: [aur-general] Huge packages in community

2009-05-02 Thread Xyne
for the lack of space months ago, and even if this package and those huge popular games 250 mb doesn't merely to be on the official repos, frankly (but thanks for the effort to waste the disk space Xyne!). Anyway, that's my humble opinion. First off I would like to say that I took over Nexuiz from

Re: [aur-general] Huge packages in community

2009-05-03 Thread Xyne
Xyne, as I said this is nothing personal with you (I can add to the list of huge maintainers: Sergej, Swiergot and many other TUs, but nexuiz was the package which finally made me upset since I was downloading by hours and the update wasn't finished just because nexuiz), and I know you

Re: [aur-general] Huge packages in community

2009-05-03 Thread Xyne
Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote: May I instead suggest you use a caching proxy for your downloading of Arch packages? That way you download only what you need, _and_ you do it only once. /M Or you can just use pkgd, which is specifically designed for this very purpose:

Re: [aur-general] changing the status of the maintainer field

2009-05-21 Thread Xyne
We really need to clarify this once and for all because this comes up at least once a month it seems. I think most people have agreed to the following definitions, which match their plain English meaning: Maintainer: The person who maintains the package currently, i.e. the person who is

Re: [aur-general] Inactivity - 21st-25th May

2009-05-21 Thread Xyne
building rss-glx on x86_64 and received a segfault as well. Anyway, enjoy your holiday! Xyne

Re: [aur-general] changing the status of the maintainer field

2009-05-21 Thread Xyne
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: What if I use abs to fetch the entire core/extra and then build and maintain that tree? Am I now the maintainer and everyone else contributors? I'll be honest: I rolled my eyes when I read that. If you began to independently maintain all of those

Re: [aur-general] changing the status of the maintainer field

2009-05-30 Thread Xyne
/orphaning process. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2009-06-01 Thread Xyne
Vinzenz Vietzke v...@archlinux.us wrote: Hi, please remove [1] since upstream development is stopped and the tool is superseeded by [2]. Thanks, vinz [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12302 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25823 -- Vinzenz Vietzke

Re: [aur-general] delete request ttf-exljbris

2009-06-09 Thread Xyne
be ideal for avoiding many legal pitfalls but opponents of the idea will simply say that the AUR already does this and that all you need to do is check the PKGBUILD and install scripts yourself. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] deletion request

2009-06-16 Thread Xyne
Hi guys Could someone please remove my swiftweasel3-pentium-m-de from AUR? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18515 It's completely deprecated and replaced by this one http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20754 (intel) You also see many other swiftweasel packages there which

Re: [aur-general] Request: Removal of java-gstreamer

2009-06-23 Thread Xyne
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:22:12 +0300 Vitaliy Berdinskikh skippe...@root.ua wrote: java-gstreamer http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24668 duplicate of gstreamer-java http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25892 If this package contains a set of java bindings, shouldn't it be named

Re: [aur-general] Request: Removal of java-gstreamer

2009-06-24 Thread Xyne
was gstreamer-java. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Xyne
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:27:43 + Laurie Clark-Michalek bluepepp...@archlinux.us wrote: 2009/6/25 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca: The maintainer of a package should be able to delete comments as this would make some of the more popular packages' comments easier to clean up. Instead of a trusted

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Xyne
2) comments section may be improved (threaded, ability of maintainer to delete dealt with comments, other?). Code blocks. Where's the code for the AUR? Maybe I can submit some patches.

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Xyne
Sorry, I missed the older than a week part. That should be more than enough time for the package to have been reported and deleted. Ignore my previous reply. One week is not enough. It must be at least one month. If a maintainer is on vacation, it's not unusual, that he can't read

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Xyne
Grigorios, you're an idiot. You're basically just trolling the thread now and, correct me if I'm wrong, have provided nothing in the way of patches for the AUR like open source is magic where you whine about stuff and it gets fixed how you like. I see absolutely no compelling reason to get

Re: [aur-general] Removing comments from AUR

2009-06-25 Thread Xyne
Principally you are right, but pressing a button report malicious package could or should send an e-mail to this mailing list or to every TU automatically. This would be the easiest way for the users. That could lead to spam. A better system would be similar to the out-of-date system that we

Re: [aur-general] automatic package creation from pypi

2009-06-27 Thread Xyne
getting this data into the output, I'll send an email and see what happens. I'll also play around a bit and see if I come up with an alternate way of getting the dependencies. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Request: Removal of warsaw

2009-06-27 Thread Xyne
Hello, I think warsaw[1] can be removed as it seems to be a misspelled duplicate of warsow[2]. Regards Thorsten [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27701 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2679 Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] AUR Moving

2009-06-27 Thread Xyne
CVS is now over ssh (the pserver is no more) and this scheme will persist with the svn conversion - so a shell account is needed to commit. To checkout: $ cvs -d:ext:account name@aur.archlinux.org:/srv/cvs/community co community cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages

2009-07-01 Thread Xyne
. Thanks Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages

2009-07-01 Thread Xyne
to be deleted.. *patpats Xyne* Cheers, Ju / Arkham When I saw that you had replied, I got worried that I might have deleted the wrong package (I double-checked before I hit delete, but still).

Re: [aur-general] AUR webpage

2009-07-01 Thread Xyne
any registered user can already adopt a package, edit it, upload it then disown it. On the other hand, not having to jump through those hoops might encourage people to update it on the spot. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Disowning monsoon, monotorrent and mono-nat

2009-07-07 Thread Xyne
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 13:59, Stefan Husmannstefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: I think the easiest way to archieve something similar to point one is to encourage everyone who orphans a package to leave a short comment, i.e orphaning, on AURs comment page. Everyone who gets notifications

Re: [aur-general] introduction and questions

2009-07-07 Thread Xyne
I thought package names had to be alphanumeric characters and the - would make the package name invalid? Although the change does work, it would require a custom edit of the source code and man page for building the app for the Arch distribution. Although it isn't much of a problem, I'm

Re: [aur-general] Disowning monsoon, monotorrent and mono-nat

2009-07-07 Thread Xyne
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:02:54 -0400 Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 03:48, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote: I think this is the best solution. Perhaps an AUR account for Phrik could be created and then used to insert comments automatically when a package is

Re: [aur-general] Initial manual cleanup

2009-07-18 Thread Xyne
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:32:12 -0700 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the official repos, so they should do things correctly. Note that

Re: [aur-general] Initial manual cleanup

2009-07-20 Thread Xyne
They are not. Any packages are not supported yet. We are testing support for any packages in addition to split packages on the main arch server. When this is complete, I will release new dbscripts Do I need to replace ('any') with ('i686' 'x86_64') in the PKGBUILD for inclusion in [community]

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-07-31 Thread Xyne
Sorry about the novel... Biru Ionut biru.io...@gmail.com wrote: not many days ago you asked be if is frustrating to have 300 packages in comparative with the number of packages that some TUs have. i see that you got now only 78 packages. Can i asked you why did you got rid of the rest? you

Re: [aur-general] Inactivity

2009-08-01 Thread Xyne
bardo wrote: I'm back! Though I have some problems on my right hand and writing is really painful at the moment. Sorry if I'll be a bit silent in the next period, I'm here, though. Welcome back! Did you have a good time? What happened to your hand?

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

2009-08-08 Thread Xyne
been expressed here. Xyne

[aur-general] Moving from AUR to community

2009-08-09 Thread Xyne
What's the recommended procedure for moving packages from the AUR into [community]? Thanks. Xyne

[aur-general] SVN Web Interface

2009-08-22 Thread Xyne
When will the View SVN Entries link on the package info pages start working for community packages? I think this was mentioned before but I'm not sure where. Thanks. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] SVN Web Interface

2009-08-22 Thread Xyne
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:01:45 -0500 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote: When will the View SVN Entries link on the package info pages start working for community packages? I think this was mentioned before but I'm not

[aur-general] Source code for community packages.

2009-08-23 Thread Xyne
on the main server? Is this all irrelevant due to some misunderstanding of the GPL's clauses? How much storage space would it take to hose source files for all current packages that require them (e.g. GPL'd binary apps)? Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Source code for community packages.

2009-08-25 Thread Xyne
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:44:58 -0400 Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Eric Bélangersnowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote: A small public repo of compiled AUR packages reminded me of something.

Re: [aur-general] AUR package updating enhancements

2009-08-27 Thread Xyne
Nélson «VuDu» Cunha vudu.cu...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, five consecutive negative replies ought to be enough, even if some of them look like they just read the last reply before them and simply missed my point. If I would've start this in the forums instead and maybe I could get a couple of

[aur-general] up-to-date package management instructions

2009-09-18 Thread Xyne
connections work. I can post the error messages but I want to make sure that Im following the right instructions before I waste someone's time. Thanks. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] up-to-date package management instructions

2009-09-18 Thread Xyne
yes they are current as far as I can see. Ronald Thanks. I seem to have gotten it working again. I also discovered a bug with any packages in communitypkg (and posted a bug report).

[aur-general] python-fuse

2009-09-20 Thread Xyne
for the mirrors to see). Does anyone feel like rebuilding python-fuse? It builds quickly and is only about 170 K to upload. Thanks. /Xyne

[aur-general] overriding architecture in split packages

2009-09-28 Thread Xyne
I'm (sort of) cross-posting but I'm hoping to get a quick answer so I can start this huge upload: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=81143 Any thoughts? Thanks, Xyne

[aur-general] I need some help with nexuiz-data.

2009-09-29 Thread Xyne
' again. I have no idea what to do now and would appreciate any insights. I've left the nexuiz src in my home dir on Sigurd for now in case it requires a rebuild (~/build/). The i686 and x86_64 package were both updated correctly so I really don't see what I'm doing wrong here. Thanks, Xyne

[aur-general] I need some help with nexuiz-data

2009-09-29 Thread Xyne
help. The package is in ~/staging/community on Sigurd. I also have a copy of the current PKGBUILD along with the Nexuiz source code in ~/build for quick rebuilds (all it does is unzip the sources, move them to $pkgdir, remove some unnecessary Windows and Mac files, then recompress). Thanks, Xyne

[aur-general] I can't see my own messages on this list.

2009-09-29 Thread Xyne
I've just checked the web archive for aur-general and saw that my message(s) about nexuiz-data when through yet I can't see them or the replies too them (in sylpheed, if that matters). This hasn't been an issue before. Please cc reples to me until the issue is resolved. As for nexuiz-data, I've

Re: [aur-general] I need some help with nexuiz-data

2009-09-30 Thread Xyne
It looks like _pkgname in the PKGBUILD overrides a variable which is internal to db-update and happens to have the same name. Here are the relevant lines in /arch/db-update: http://pastebin.com/f2b478ad - see my comments on each highlighted line for what I believe is going on and causes

[aur-general] testing

2009-09-30 Thread Xyne
Schrödinger's emai when I open my inbox, it either will or will not be there but before that I cannot know. :P

[aur-general] test 2

2009-09-30 Thread Xyne
I'm able to view my own posts to aur-dev and other lists so Sylpheed doesn't seem to be a problem. Maybe someone hacked my aur-general preferences. I've unsubscribed, resubscribed and checked my preferences. Now to test it... (sorry for the noise)

[aur-general] Yet another test.

2009-10-01 Thread Xyne
Can one of the list admins please email me so we can figure out why I no longer recieve messages from this list? I'm not a big fan of frustration.

Re: [aur-general] Status of the Chromium/Chrome packages on AUR

2009-10-02 Thread Xyne
Just testing if I can reply to the previous message which actually showed up in my inbox (and see the reply itself). Sorry for the noise

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2009-10-12 Thread Xyne
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:03:05 -0300 Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve wrote: Hi all, I'd like to re-apply to my TU position. Since I've resigned [0], many things happened, in my life, and work. In these times I was very dissapointed about myself, cause I was having problems to handle

[aur-general] AUR Jamie account

2009-10-12 Thread Xyne
suggestion on the forum but it apparently didn't get through so he asked me to do it, hence this message. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] AUR Jamie account

2009-10-12 Thread Xyne
When I said inactivity I wasn't talking about someone who hadn't posted in a while. I'm talking about accounts that have been active for six years and /never /used. I generally agree with most of what has been said so far. The only reason that I consider this reasonable is that an AUR

Re: [aur-general] AUR Jamie account

2009-10-12 Thread Xyne
loads of typos Sorry, my ability to type is inversely proportional to how much sleep I get.

Re: [aur-general] TU Vote Results: Angel Velásquez (angvp)

2009-10-26 Thread Xyne
Jaroslav Lichtblau t...@dragonlord.cz wrote: Everyone returns Welcome back, Angel! Cheers Jaroslav They always come back. ¡Enhorabuena, Angel!

Re: [aur-general] Community commit messages

2009-11-07 Thread Xyne
Why? What is wrong with the scripts in devtools? It is just 'makechrootpkg' followed by 'communitypkg message'. You are lucky Aaron is on holiday because people not using those scripts is one of his pet peeves. :) I wrote my own during the transition before the old ones were

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2009-11-08 Thread Xyne
guidelines and modify the affected packages, or does it simply not matter? It seems unfortunate that non-standard names can get locked in this way. In this case, there are only 3 prosody packages between 2 maintainers. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] unparseable PKGBUILD

2009-11-10 Thread Xyne
such an error. Thanks for comments. - ben Hi Ben, This may be a silly question, but are you submitting a gzipped tarball (*.tar.gz) which contains your PKGBUILD in the root directory? Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] unparseable PKGBUILD

2009-11-10 Thread Xyne
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:17:02 +0100 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: hello list, Sorry if i post on the wrong list. I have several PKGBUILDs that were parsed OK by the AUR website but are not anymore. The error given is 'unknown file format'. I re-read the PKGBUILD rules on the wiki but did

Re: [aur-general] perl-libwww duplicates

2009-11-11 Thread Xyne
://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25736 = perl-http-response http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25735 = perl-lwp-simple http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27566 = perl-lwp-useragent http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25734 I'm going to cc this to xyne Thanks

Re: [aur-general] perl-libwww duplicates

2009-11-11 Thread Xyne
Perhaps this would be a good opportunity to ask everyone packaging CPAN modules to at least look at the provides string generated by pacpan. It cross-references all names with their associated source files to generate a comprehensive list. I've moved it into [community] now, so it's be easily

Re: [aur-general] perl-libwww duplicates

2009-11-12 Thread Xyne
miserably. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] perl-libwww duplicates

2009-11-12 Thread Xyne
, but in the context of the depends array I really don't know what you mean by defaulting to print everything. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] perl-libwww duplicates

2009-11-13 Thread Xyne
= perl-http-headers http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25730 = perl-http-request http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25736 = perl-http-response http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25735 = perl-lwp-simple

Re: [aur-general] Please remove duplicate flight-of-the-amazon-queen

2009-11-13 Thread Xyne
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:23:30 +0100 Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: Please remove the AUR duplicate package flight-of-the-amazon-queen which is technically inferior to fotaq, a more modern package with the same content. -- Sven-Hendrik Done. The strange thing is that both

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

2009-11-18 Thread Xyne
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:17:24 +1000 Allan McRae wrote: My only problem with Ranguvar is that he changes his avatar on the forums too much! :D Then again, his sponsor is becoming guilty of that too... What, is it wednesday already? *changes avatar*

Re: [aur-general] avoid usage of fakeroot: always use of build() and package() (Was: application as a TU)

2009-11-22 Thread Xyne
_install_dir { _src_dir=$1 _dest_dir=$2 _n=${#_src_dir} for _file in $(find $_src_dir -type f) do _dest_file=${_dest_dir}${_file:$_n} install -Dm644 $_file $_dest_file done } Obviously it could be modified to accept a permissions argument as well. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

2009-11-23 Thread Xyne
discover, huh? :P Ok, the voting period for Ranguvar's TU application has begun.TUs, please log in to the AUR and vote. Someone please check that I've correctly set up the vote. Thanks, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] How to include sources from sourceforge + creating links not provided by package

2009-11-24 Thread Xyne
discussion. Join us again next week when Xyne bores you with more knowledge gained from playing with FUSE.

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

2009-11-24 Thread Xyne
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 17:07, Laurie Clark-Michalek bluepepp...@archlinux.us wrote: May I recommend the marquee tag. Better yet, an animated gif with sparkles! :D Set up a twitter account while you're at it.

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User Application

2009-11-30 Thread Xyne
The voting period for Ranguvar's TU application has now ended. With 15 yes votes, 0 no votes and 22 active TUs (according to the wiki), quorum has been reached and the application has been accepted. Welcome aboard, Ranguvar! Go through the new TU checklist here (I've already given you TU status

Re: [aur-general] Split package pkgrel/arch issue

2009-12-07 Thread Xyne
. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Away from my PC - away from bugtracker.

2009-12-10 Thread Xyne
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: Hello all I will be away from now for about two or more weeks. I recently surfered an small irritation on my eyss, so I can not stay on my PC :( Leaving the bugtracker in their hands, I hope to be with you again soon. Best regards. Gerardo Exequiel

Re: [aur-general] perl-rename and prename

2009-12-15 Thread Xyne
is just an extract from a package which includes the CPAN module then I would agree as it is much more KISS to grab it directly from CPAN. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] welcome our newest TU, Ray Rashif!

2009-12-16 Thread Xyne
Chris Brannon wrote: This message marks the end of the voting period. Here are the numbers: total voters = 17 yes votes = 13 no votes = 0 abstainers = 4 active TUs = 23 (according to the wiki) quorum = 46/3 TUs (we'll round that to 15) majority = 9 yes In other words, we not only

Re: [aur-general] Voting for djszapi results

2009-12-17 Thread Xyne
be found in the previous discussion period. For the future perhaps you can request an additional submission field for the vote form which would allow voters to include a reason that could then be cited with the results. Regards, Xyne

Re: [aur-general] Voting for djszapi results

2009-12-17 Thread Xyne
TU votes were never meant to be secret, it only came about as the implementation of the voting application. We don't live under a violent military coup or anything. You should be able to identify with your thoughts in a free society. The discussion period is there for people to voice any

Re: [aur-general] Trusted Users, Secret ballots, Openness?

2009-12-17 Thread Xyne
no secretly), I think you have a bigger problem then the openness of the ballot itself. I'm going to try to limit my replies to this thread now. Sorry for the noise. Xyne

Re: [aur-general] move schismtracker to AUR

2009-12-21 Thread Xyne
any objections. uhm...I know my English is very bad, but I think objection must be singular, not plural. can be more than one objection. two objections :D Is there any objection? - any objection? Are there any objections? - any objections? Both are fine.

Re: [aur-general] Voting for djszapi results

2010-01-07 Thread Xyne
Come on, let it rest. :) Best regards, A random reader of the Arch Linux mailinglist Replying to a dead thread to tell someone to let it rest is very trollish. Don't do that.

Re: [aur-general] Thanks to Ghost1227 and wonder

2010-01-19 Thread Xyne
Hi all, We should give a big cheer to Daniel (Ghost1227) and Ionut (wonder) for all the work they have done on the [community] bug tracker recently. Over the last week, the number of bugs has shrunk from ~120 to 17. That is a massive effort! Thanks, Allan Well done! So, when

Re: [aur-general] Inactivity notice

2010-01-23 Thread Xyne
And a long time indeed has passed, but today I finally got my Internet connection back! I have a mile-long backlog to catch up with, but I'll try to sync with the rest of the world as soon as possible. Welcome back to the internet!

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >