Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#13776] Orphan Request for chatty

2019-01-16 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 11.01.2019 kl. 15.25 skrev notify--- via aur-requests: > bus [1] filed a orphan request for chatty [2]: > > No updates in months. The maintainer is MIA, not responding to emails. My e-mail client had decided to stop checking for new mails in my Arch Linux folder, so I wasn't getting (or

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#13090] Orphan Request for lutris-git

2018-10-30 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 30/10/2018 kl. 15.24 skrev mikey d: > I think ideally we should just add you as a contact maintainer. You can add me as a co-maintainer and then step down, if you wish, that should transfer the package to me. :) > […] Typically you don't really touch git packages unless > the install needs

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#13090] Orphan Request for lutris-git

2018-10-30 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 28/10/2018 kl. 18.31 skrev notify--- via aur-requests: > WhatTheBuck [1] filed a orphan request for lutris-git [2]: > > Maintainer is MIA and package is missing deps. Maintainer used to be active on IRC, but I haven't seen them in a while. I used to be the maintainer of lutris-git[1] before

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11677] Orphan Request for gtimelog

2018-06-04 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 04-06-2018 kl. 10:42 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: > Package is out-of-date since at least March. Here's an updated > PKGBUILD which should just work fine. I wasn't able to contact Freso > unfortunately... How/where did you try? I can't find any e-mails from you (or anyone else on the

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11321] Deletion Request for musicbrainz

2018-05-06 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 05-05-2018 kl. 15:48 skrev notify--- via aur-requests: > gspu [1] filed a deletion request for musicbrainz [2]: > > You can delete this repo since there is extra/libmusicbrainz5 5.1.0-2 > > AUR-Version is: > musicbrainz 2.1.5-8 > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gspu/ > [2]

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#9351] Orphan Request for razercommander-git

2017-10-08 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 03-10-2017 kl. 21:38 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: > Freso [1] filed a orphan request for razercommander-git [2]: > > Despite 8 month old comments, the current maintainer still does not > follow best practices/standards for writing PKGBUILDs. The maintainer has started actually cleaning up

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#8499] Request for openvas9

2017-07-31 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 14-07-2017 kl. 06:21 skrev Naruto Windy via aur-requests: > maintainer in the arch main repos is not responding to the out-dated-flag, > > so im requesting in AUR to make a PKGBUILD for the latest version of > openvas9 Please follow the instructions here:

Re: [aur-requests] Deletion Request for libphash

2017-06-08 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 08-06-2017 kl. 03:01 skrev Fabian Maurer: > The package can't be found in the webinterface but is still in the git tree. > I want to maintain it and upload a working version for everyone to find. Just `git pull` the AUR git repository, make your changes/replace with your own PKGBUILD, and

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#7932] Deletion Request for lutris-git

2017-04-16 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 15-04-2017 kl. 22:58 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: > strycore [1] filed a deletion request for lutris-git [2]: > > I would like this package to be deleted, lutris is now released every > 2 weeks and there is no need to have this. That's still up to 2 weeks where the -git package would be

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#6439] Request Accepted

2016-09-22 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 23-09-2016 kl. 00:09 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: > Request #6439 has been accepted by xyproto [1]. ... 1) No reply to my objection. 2) Less than 12 hours between request submitted and it being accepted/executed. 3) Requested and accepted by same TU. Really? -- Namasté, Frederik

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#6439] Deletion Request for lwjgl

2016-09-22 Thread FrederikFresoS . Olesen via aur-requests
Den 22-09-2016 kl. 13:56 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: > xyproto [1] filed a deletion request for lwjgl [2]: > > No packages uses lwjglm. lwjgl2 is used instead. Just because no packages are depending on it doesn't mean that the package isn't being used. -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S.