Request #19464 has been rejected by eschwartz [1]:
And yet, in the package details, you left a comment with the correct
approach, which is to ask for it to be fixed instead of asking for the
package to no longer be available either way.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
Request #19449 has been rejected by eschwartz [1]:
Duplicate request, perhaps due to a browser reload resubmitting it
seconds later with the same content.
Oops. :)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/
Request #19430 has been accepted by eschwartz [1]:
Pinned comment:
> This package is an attempt to facilitate C++ development against
clang trunk. It's based on the llvm-svn package, but the split package
has been removed in favor of a single fat package.
Yeah, I have no idea why the submitter
Dear Trusted Users,
I would like to make a removal request for the basilisk package. The mainliner
of this package made some changes in the PKGBUILD which are contrary to the
intentions of the developers. For example he disabled the webrtc support. And I
think this doesn’t fit into the
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07:24PM +0200, Barnabás Béres via aur-requests wrote:
> Dear Trusted Users,
>
> I would like to make a removal request for the basilisk package. The mainliner
> of this package made some changes in the PKGBUILD which are contrary to the
> intentions of the developers.
Request #19465 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2018-09-02.
xantares [1] filed an orphan request for python-typepy [2]:
flagged 1 year ago
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xantares/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-typepy/
MrWinux [1] filed a deletion request for basilisk [2]:
Dear Trusted Users,
I would like to make a removal request for the basilisk package. The
mainliner
of this package made some changes in the PKGBUILD which are contrary
to the
intentions of the developers. For example he disabled the webrtc
intelfx [1] filed a request to merge superiotool-svn [2] into
superiotool-git [3]:
Upstream moved to Git
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/intelfx/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/superiotool-svn/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/superiotool-git/
za3k [1] filed a deletion request for fabric1 [2]:
Broken on initial upload due to removed dependency--will resubmit
after this is resolved.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/za3k/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/fabric1/
Request #19481 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
Deletion of a fresh package requested by its current maintainer.
Request #19467 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The user celogeek deleted the package.
celogeek [1] filed a deletion request for jitsi-meet-stable [2]:
bundling is a bad idea on arch
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/celogeek/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jitsi-meet-stable/
Request #19483 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
Deletion of a fresh package requested by its current maintainer.
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nemo-icons-git
[2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons-git, which provides the extension for
nemo as well
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-nemo-icons-git/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-caja-icons-git
[2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons-git, which provides the extension for
caja as well
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-caja-icons-git/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-caja-icons-py2
[2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons, which provides the extension for
caja as well
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-caja-icons-py2/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
py2 [2]:
Dropping Python 2 support (dependency python2-nautilus does not exist
anymore in any case)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-nautilus-icons-py2/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
common [2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons, which is no longer split into a
'common' and other packages
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-nautilus-icons-common/
bnavigator [1] filed a deletion request for evdi-4.19 [2]:
aur/evdi-1.7.0 supports kernels from 4.15 to 5.6
See also my comment in the aur/displaylink package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bnavigator/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/evdi-4.19/
a36233 [1] filed a request to merge omnetpp-qt [2] into omnetpp-
preview [3]:
rename package to meet upstream naming, *-qt no longer relevant
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a36233/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/omnetpp-qt/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/omnetpp-preview/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
py2-git [2]:
Upstream restructured and I don't want to maintain a PY2 version of
the package
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-nautilus-icons-py2-git/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
common-py2-git [2]:
No longer needed due to upstream not being split into a separate
common package anymore (also I don't want to maintain a Python2
version of the package anymore)
[1]
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
common-py2 [2]:
Upstream is no longer split into "common" and other packages, and I
don't want to maintain a Python2 version of the package anymore.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2]
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nemo-icons [2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons, which provides the extension for
nemo as well
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/git-nemo-icons/
chrisjbillington [1] filed a deletion request for git-nautilus-icons-
common-git [2]:
Superseded by git-nautilus-icons-git, which is no longer split so
doesn't need a common package
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/chrisjbillington/
[2]
Martchus [1] filed a deletion request for mingw-w64-freetype2-minimal
[2]:
My package `mingw-w64-freetype2-bootstrap` serves the exact same
purpose and should be sufficient. Considering the package is not
maintained anymore I would remove it.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Martchus/
[2]
dvzrv [1] filed a deletion request for jitsi-meet-stable [2]:
This package has previously been deleted.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-
requests/2020-May/040794.html
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dvzrv/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jitsi-meet-stable/
Request #19429 has been accepted by eschwartz [1]:
Thanks, the package is a lie, it claims to be "stable" but packages
are by default stable. What it actually does is build 3 software
bundles into one package.
> The same tag is applied on jicofo, jitsi-videobridge and jitsi-meet,
so this package
xuanruiqi [1] filed an orphan request for nemo-dropbox [2]:
Have not been updated in a while despite flags and comments
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xuanruiqi/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nemo-dropbox/
Hi aur-requests,You are running low of data volume (85% Storage Low).Avoid account malfunction, and retrieve pending mails from clicking on the below link
GET MORE FREE STORAGE aur-requests@archlinux.org
We will not be responsible for any mail malfunction or account locked up if after this
31 matches
Mail list logo
