On 02/20/2018 09:24 PM, Jakob Gahde via aur-requests wrote:
> So now on to the technical side.
> 1. Personally I used to be a big fan of namcap myself, but over time
> I’ve come to take it’s output with a grain of salt. It gets a lot of
> the basics right and is very helpful for some easy-to-miss
Hi Bruno,
first of all, thanks for that elaborate response! It seems that when I looked
at your PKGBUILD, I let myself be guided to premature assumptions by the
similar structure and also the version adjustment in provides in particular,
I’m sorry about that! It was some of the details like
Hi,
Thanks for your email and sorry about this… This is quite a long story,
but those deletion notifications (as a matter of fact, 5 packages from
the `(ocaml-)merlin` dependency tree are “affected”) now remind me I was
only half-way through before I had to go…
First thing is that I did not use
FWIW, great to have this in community. Not so great that a deletion request is
the first thing that informs me about this and even less so to have somebody
else run off with the work that I put into figuring out how to make this piece
of software install correctly and only add a few mostly
mis [1] filed a deletion request for dune [2]:
in [community]
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/dune/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mis/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dune/
