very true. tim was asking for months.
> On 24 Jul 2016, at 2:41 PM, Reg Moore wrote:
>
> The probable reason that Nigel wasn't considered for an award was that he was
> not nominated. The GFA Executive and Board can only issue awards to persons
> nominated they are not
Hear hear EP.
From: emillis prelgauskas
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:52 AM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission
This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each generation
succeeding the one before
This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each generation
succeeding the one before
only knows what they know, and records that for posterity.
Like the re-imagining of the history of the sport’s formation and early growth
by the late Maurice Little when the current magazine
Well said Bob.
Noel.
From: Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] On Behalf Of
Bob Ward
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:17 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission
I seldom post on this site
Hi Bob,
I truly believe that overlooking Nigel’s contribution was an unintentional
oversight. The first I heard of the award was today and I immediately phoned
Nigel with my concern as to him not being given credit for what he had done. I
then also emailed an appropriate GFA official
GFA could award Nigel next year. Maybe no one nominated him!
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Bob Ward wrote:
>
>
>
> I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has
> essentially been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out, the
>
From: Bob Ward
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:46 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission
I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has essentially
been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out,
I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has essentially
been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out, the associated comments
in the announcement were correct. Harry did finance the development of Aus
Flarm when he had confidence that Nigel was on to something
And while going Nigel he was also responsible for the beep back that you
hear at every certified airport in Australia. I think there was confusion
over frequency at Bundaberg and in this case Dick Smith kicked off the need
for such device and Nigel came to the rescue.
Ian McPhee
0428847642
Box