Hi all,
Harry Meldicotts post sums up the issue brilliantly, and succintly, I wish I
could have put it that well!
Highlight for me was;
"Credulity is stretched by those who seek to justify this position.
Arguments such as "we know best, can't trust the members to elect the right
people"
gi
Mark,
I didn't know that the RAAF had any gliders. I suspect dual control
inspections were invented around the beginning of WW1 shortly after
controls went INSIDE the aircraft. Maybe the concept even came from
Victorian era steam engineers.
Dual control inspections after maintenance when con
OK Lets give it a try,
Please post the list of those who will accept nominations, and the positions
they want so I can cast a vote.
Alan Wilson
_
From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Robert Hart
Sen
harry medlicott wrote:
General members should have the right to directly vote for those
who wish to represent them, preferably through an optional preferential
postal voting system. States rights can be protected by having Board
members elected on a state electorate basis. The co
Congratulations Harry, yours is the most sensible post I have read on this
subject.
I would support amendment to the GFA organisation for one major reason: to
reduce the cost of overheads. I appreciate the work done by the existing
members of the Board, but I have seen no evidence that they are act
Thanks Terry,
If anything, you were one of the best Presidents the GFA has ever had. Your
ability to take a simple approach to issues and deal with them effectively
was brilliant.
You have done so again with your post. AND you have hit the nail on the
head. Anyone can make a difference. Anyo
Thanks for that Al =)
Cheers,
Richard
--- On Tue, 28/4/09, Al Borowski wrote:
From: Al Borowski
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] GFA matters. Democracy vs. reality
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
Received: Tuesday, 28 April, 2009, 11:53 AM
Hi Richard,
[...]
