Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

That’s a bit of a stretch isn’t it though for a general use case. It’s pretty simple to 1. Not enable remote printing from another subnet / the internet by default 2. Not allow printing without proper auth, especially remotely 3. Not allow incoming connections through a router without

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, 13:21 James Hodgkinson, wrote: > I could see it as being a great option, but making it a default would be a > support nightmare. > > "but grandma's printer works from anywhere, why doesn't mine?" How often have you heard of or seen anybody print something remotely from

Re: [AusNOG] .au whois server is missing, assumed Borg'ed.

Dear Noggers, I think you will find your whois is happy again. Whilst whois.auda.org.au is the ‘official’ server, whois.audns.net.au is now functional again. Kind Regards, James Deck Director p1300 932 776 ejd...@clevvi.com.au wclevvi.com.au aUnit 22, 489 South Street, Toowoomba 4350 Unit 14,

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

+1 Fine if a manufacturer wants to add a nerd knob for this, but as a default, no. I want a printer to get new firmware and keep it upto date - NOT getting firmware updates is normally a major security risk. MMC > On 16 Oct 2019, at 12:50 pm, James Hodgkinson wrote: > > I could see it as

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

On Wed, 16 Oct. 2019, 2:17 pm Paul Brooks, wrote: > On 15/10/2019 5:09 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote: > > Well that is interesting Narelle, however, if it's anticompetitive to > discriminately treat packet based VOIP traffic, then it is likewise > anticompetetive to cross subsidise your circuit based

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

Hi Paul, That page is only accurate when the device firmware is up-to-date and Telstra have deployed the correct preference to the device. I've got to the point of disabling this feature due to too many calls being routed over WiFi in the presence of maximum or near-maximum signal strength +

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

On 15/10/2019 5:09 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote: > Well that is interesting Narelle, however, if it's anticompetitive to > discriminately > treat packet based VOIP traffic, then it is likewise anticompetetive to cross > subsidise your circuit based business by shunting traffic over a competitors' >

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

My wife is on Telstra with the latest model iPhone and it most definitely is not last resort. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:14 PM Paul Wilkins wrote: > So I checked the Telstra terms, which states that Wi-Fi Calling *uses > WiFi as a network of last resort*: > > >

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

Interesting, my take on how wifi calling works is like most things RF, strongest signal wins, certainly not a last resort, but, thats just my understanding of it On 16/10/2019 12:12, Paul Wilkins wrote: > So I checked the Telstra terms, which states that Wi-Fi Calling USES WIFI AS > A NETWORK

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

Err - since when have we not wanted to divert traffic across lower cost networks? Geeze I remember being sternly told by a certain Geoff H in the early 90s that we couldn't make our international links too cheap as "PEOPLE WILL PUT VOICE ON IT!!" Exactly. What's good for the goose... N On

Re: [AusNOG] (Probably a bit OT) IPv6 oddity

On 15/10/19 3:05 pm, Karl Auer wrote: > Had an interesting (to me) case last week. Client rang on his mobile to > say his phones didn't work and also he couldn't get to his bank or > anything else - except Google. Also, I found I was able to use > TeamViewer to access one of his PCs. > > He's

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

I could see it as being a great option, but making it a default would be a support nightmare. "but grandma's printer works from anywhere, why doesn't mine?" James On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, at 12:06, Paul Brooks wrote: > On 15/10/2019 2:33 pm, Mark Smith wrote: > > I recently bought an IPv6 enabled

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

So I checked the Telstra terms, which states that Wi-Fi Calling *uses WiFi as a network of last resort*: https://www.telstra.com.au/support/category/mobiles-tablets/telstra-wi-fi-calling/what-is-telstra-wi-fi-calling Wi-Fi Calling enables you to make voice calls using a Fixed Broadband Wi-Fi

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

On 15/10/2019 2:33 pm, Mark Smith wrote: > I recently bought an IPv6 enabled Wifi printer. As it is attached to > my single Wifi SSID it is configuring itself with IPv6 global > addresses, even though I don't need it to be reachable from the > Internet or able to reach the Internet. (It would be

[AusNOG] FW: [pacnog] APRICOT 2020 Fellowships

On behalf of APNOG ... see below. Regards, Terry Sweetser General Manager, IX Australia terry.sweet...@ix.asn.au -Original Message- From: pacnog-boun...@pacnog.org On Behalf Of Philip Smith Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2019 9:09 AM To: PacNOG Subject: [pacnog] APRICOT 2020

Re: [AusNOG] .au whois server is missing, assumed Borg'ed.

Thanks for the tip Shane. /etc/whois.conf didn't exist in my Ubuntu instance, however creating the file and adding the line as you suggested worked! Shaun Haddrill Treasurer, Electronic Frontiers Australia Email: treasu...@efa.org.au website: www.efa.org.au On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:27, Shane

Re: [AusNOG] NTT / i3d issues ?

Hi Joe, Can you please send me some MTR results, time frames and your source/destination IPs in a direct mail? We will happily look into this. We have a public looking glass which is also referenced on the AusNOG website: https://noc.i3d.net/lg/ Best regards, Martijn Schmidt i3D.net / AS49544

Re: [AusNOG] NTT / i3d issues ?

We are having the same issue. Increase latency between AWS-Sydney and NTT. Normal was 10ms but now having >250ms On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:39 PM Joseph Goldman wrote: > Hi list, > > Anyone from either NTT or i3d on list? > > Seeing high latency from many endpoints into i3d sydney,

[AusNOG] NTT / i3d issues ?

Hi list,  Anyone from either NTT or i3d on list?  Seeing high latency from many endpoints into i3d sydney, specifically those that have to go through NTT - the path looks like it stays in Sydney but (testing from Telstra connections thus far) high-ish latency (80+ms) starts at the ntt

Re: [AusNOG] (Probably a bit OT) IPv6 oddity

2 from 2 of the Arcadyan modems supplied to other family by Telstra have exhibited the same issue. Whirlpool is full of complaints of similar things. Something to do with UPNP apparently. "Intermittent internet access" is the typical reported fault, however when debugging the issue I found the

Re: [AusNOG] (Probably a bit OT) IPv6 oddity

I've seen those Optus branded Netgear cable routers stop handing out DHCP to the local network, but will continue to route just fine. Typically, if there is bad power (brownouts, etc.), this can happen. Jamie On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 3:05 pm, Karl Auer wrote: > Had an interesting (to me) case

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

Hi, WiFi calling is a user configurable option. It's available on Optus, Vodafone, and Tesltra. The OP's customer is paying the OP for Internet. They've entered into a contract for provision of service. They should be able to use that service within the terms and conditions. I don't see why the

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, 17:37 Dave Browning, wrote: > My “workaround” for this is to drop all IPv6 ingress on my router for any > devices MAC I don’t want getting an IPv6 address. That way it can’t get an > address from the likes of IPv6 stateless address auto configuration. > > Haven’t tested

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

My “workaround” for this is to drop all IPv6 ingress on my router for any devices MAC I don’t want getting an IPv6 address. That way it can’t get an address from the likes of IPv6 stateless address auto configuration. Haven’t tested enough to know what other implications this may cause. > On

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019, 17:13 Tomas Gibbs, wrote: > IIRC should be just fine to give it a public address aslong as you have > firewalls in front to block traffic from outside to in. > Why give a device a public address if it doesn't need it to do its job? You don't need a network firewall to

Re: [AusNOG] Default IPv6 Local Only Addressing for Non-Internet Devices

IIRC should be just fine to give it a public address aslong as you have firewalls in front to block traffic from outside to in. Get Outlook for Android From: AusNOG on behalf of Mark Smith Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:33:34 PM To:

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Wi-Fi calling on our network.

Well that is interesting Narelle, however, if it's anticompetitive to discriminately treat packet based VOIP traffic, then it is likewise anticompetetive to cross subsidise your circuit based business by shunting traffic over a competitors' packet based network. What's sauce for the goose etc.