Re: [AusNOG] All AU Locations Virtual Machine

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:23:33AM +1000, Project AnyCast wrote: > I am in urgent need of a Virtual Machine of low'ish specs in all locations > of Australia > Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra and Tasmania /me whistles "one of these things is not like the other..." - Matt

Re: [AusNOG] Risks to country and business infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:25:49PM +1000, Andras Toth wrote: > This is the same as saying it's Amazon's fault that people make their S3 > buckets public and information gets exposed. Misconfigure it once, shame on you. Misconfigure it 1,000 times, shame on the system. Also, AWS have been doing

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Exchange Access (Break-in's)

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:19:55AM +, Mark Delany wrote: > The ABC article says 44 exchanges in the Sydney area! > > That suggests something far more organized than a couple of vandals or > opportunistic copper thieves. (Is copper theft even a thing in > Australia?) > > What a strange crime

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > Now I would say that for instance, if the eSecurity Director posts the CRC > of a file as being "abhorrent violent" content, and your company doesn't > expeditiously take down that material, expect problems down the pike. I > doubt a

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 06:03:12AM +, Chad Kelly wrote: > On 4/6/2019 12:00 PM, Mark Newton wrote: > > This passed the Senate after 90 seconds of debate without the bill > > itself being made available to MPs last night. > > > > It passed the House today after about four minutes of debate with

Re: [AusNOG] IPsec VPN over 4G telstra issue

On 19 Sep 2018, at 4:33 pm, Dino Sosic wrote: > Apparently Telstra confirmed today that there are issues with forming VPN > IPsecs over 4G SIMs on telstra.internet APN. Anyone experiencing the same > or knows anything about it? I have multiple sites down. IKE packets simply > not making it to the

Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 12:58:56AM +, Matthew Enger wrote: > We run our own dns servers mostly because some sites look at where the dns > query is coming from and depending on that return results that are local. > > E.g. Facebook. If you resolve using google’s dns the Facebook traffic >

Re: [AusNOG] Au > South Africa Customer Link

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:05:10PM +1100, Greg McLennan wrote: > Having some experience on this... > If latency isn't a big issue > > On 18 Dec 2017, at 3:14 pm, Cameron Murray wrote: > > > They use a Latency sensitive application which is what they are trying > > > to

Re: [AusNOG] QoS on Internet traffic

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 01:00:39PM +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > If your client sites have redundant links, you can get massive performance > benefit by routing bulk transfer via the backup path. > > As for there is no QoS on the internet, that's mostly because US service > providers are

Re: [AusNOG] Government intends to pass TSSR this parliament

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:28:41PM +1000, Andrew McN wrote: > On 15/06/17 10:06, Matt Palmer wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:48:38PM +1000, Andrew McN wrote: > >> I doubt they'd bother trying to breaking encryption. It seems more > >> likely that their plan is t

Re: [AusNOG] Government intends to pass TSSR this parliament

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:48:38PM +1000, Andrew McN wrote: > I doubt they'd bother trying to breaking encryption. It seems more > likely that their plan is to force players like Google or IOS to push > malware out to people's phones to circumvent the encryption. Even easier plan: just make