rookfield <
> nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au>
> Cc: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Leaky Feeder & UTP
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2020 11:06 pm, John Edwards wrote:
> > Separation distance is also prudent for electrical safety between
> > systems tha
ookfield
Cc: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Leaky Feeder & UTP
On 03/03/2020 11:06 pm, John Edwards wrote:
> Separation distance is also prudent for electrical safety between
> systems that have different electrical characteristics, in the event
> of an incident that causes th
On 03/03/2020 11:06 pm, John Edwards wrote:
> Separation distance is also prudent for electrical safety between
> systems that have different electrical characteristics, in the event of
> an incident that causes the cables to become uninsulated and in contact
> with each other.
>
Thanks John -
Running leaky feeder at 100W EIRP is going to cause all kinds of major
issues, although induced current in nearby UTP probably isn't one of them.
Technically a "radiated" signal from notches in leaky feeder is going to be
at right angles to parallel cables and unable to induce a current, the risk
Mal,
I think it all depends on the band to be honest but it’s most likely to be UHF
400-520MHz in which case even if if was radiating 100 Watts EIRP it’s unlikely
to cause you any major issues if you’re any more than 300mm away.
The impact of RF signals on data traveling through the line would
Interested in hearing from any RF gurus who have run Leaky Feeder and
unshielded UTP cables, in underground tunnel environments - what cable
separation distance did you use to minimise any noise from the UTP
services that are run in parallel ?
Regards,
Mal
_
