Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

2018-04-01 Thread Matthew Enger
We run our own dns servers mostly because some sites look at where the dns query is coming from and depending on that return results that are local. E.g. Facebook. If you resolve using google’s dns the Facebook traffic goes via international however if you resolve off our dns servers it goes

Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

2018-04-01 Thread James Deck
We've been using 9.9.9.9, which does not resolve some known "bad" traffic (eg. phishing). My understanding is that the have been unable to peer to the major ISPs here, so their traffic routes aren't always direct, but I like the security aspect of it. https://www.quad9.net/ ​Kind Regards,

[AusNOG] Aruba 3.5v micro usb console cable

2018-04-01 Thread Peter Tiggerdine
Hi All Happy Easter. Apologies for the noise. Does anyone in Brisbane happen to have a Aruba 3.5v micro usb console cable I can borrow for a couple of hours? Happy to pay or borrow, whichever way suits. Regards, Peter Tiggerdine GPG Fingerprint: 2A3F EA19 F6C2 93C1 411D 5AB2 D5A8 E8A8 0E74

Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

2018-04-01 Thread Gavin Tweedie
I burnt a few of my RIPE Atlas credits last night and did a traceroute from every probe in AU & NZ (221 of them) to the following "popular" open resolvers. (if you want to host one so you can earn some credits of your own and there's not one in your ASN yet then email me directly - or learn more

Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

2018-04-01 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Apr 1, 2018, at 6:02 PM, James Deck wrote: > > We've been using 9.9.9.9, which does not resolve some known "bad" traffic > (eg. phishing). > > My understanding is that the have been unable to peer to the major ISPs here, > so their traffic routes aren't always

Re: [AusNOG] 1.1.1.1 DNS resolvers

2018-04-01 Thread Terry Manderson
I saw the blog post and already had some awareness that this was coming, but there is one question I have for Australian operators. How many operators promote services like 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8 to their customers instead of operating their own recursive DNS infrastructure? And if you do, what