Re: Fw: Purpose of Port 0. (About Bug 1068)

Sorry, I wasn't quite clear what you mean by "What I suggest in Bug 1068 is intended to be along those lines", I might be able to use a bit of explanation. As in: what do you suggest we do and not do to the current texts of the standard, and why? I actually thought that port 0 was reserved

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001119]: When the file named by the operand does not exist, `file` should not exit with zero status

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1119 == Reported By:mhjacobson Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001119]: When the file named by the operand does not exist, `file` should not exit with zero status

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1119 == Reported By:mhjacobson Assigned To: