Re: SIGCHLD trap in a shell

2017-04-26 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2017-04-25 21:32:56 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > There is no requirement that a trap be executed each time a particular > signal is generated. There is no requirement that the system keep a > count of instances of a particular pending signal; only that the signal > is pending. SIGCHLD isn't

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001121]: is the stat data undefined for dangling symlinks, without FTW_PHYS?

2017-04-26 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1121 == Reported By:djdelorie Assigned To:

Re: SIGCHLD trap in a shell

2017-04-26 Thread Chet Ramey
On 4/25/17 9:21 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > * With bash and posh, I get: > > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > [...] > > i.e. no trap executions at all. > > If I add "set -m", then bash behaves like ash, etc., except that it > no longer reacts to Ctrl-C (the Ctrl-C only interrupts the sleep). I'm