With that phrasing is also reserved, since it is not
" followed ONLY by uppercase". Using ".NO_parallel" would be similarly
conforming, it could be argued.
On Monday, November 2, 2020 Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote, on 31 Oct 2020:
>
> Well this
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 12:54 -0400, Single UNIX Specification via
austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
> Start time:Today 11:00 AM
Apologies that I won't be able to attend today's meeting and I won't be
able to give Geoff's updated text for issue #1325 the attention it
deserves before then.
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1302
==
Reported By:geoffclare
Assigned To:
Joerg Schilling wrote, on 31 Oct 2020:
>
> Well this is true. As long as POSIX does not mention parallel builds at all,
> it makes no sense for .WAIT to appear in a POSIX standard - except as a
> reserved special target.
It's already in the reserved namespace, so no need to reserve it
