Re: utilities and write errors

Section 1.4 of the Commands and Utilities Volume of the standard (Utility Description Defaults) already does this in the CONSEQUENCES OF ERRORS section on P2303-2304, L74122-74151 in P1003.1-202x Draft 2 and on P2341-2342, L74540-74569 in P1003.1-2017. Note especially: The following shall

utilities and write errors

Shouldn't POSIX require that when a utility cannot write its output (e.g. due to ENOSPC or EPIPE), it shall be regarded as an error, i.e. the exit status be non zero, with a diagnostic message if possible? -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML -

[Issue 8 drafts 0001476]: Missing '+' character in the second example explanation

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1476 == Reported By:kre Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001476]: Missing '+' character in the second example explanation

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1476 == Reported By:kre Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001448]: Misleading text in description of poll()

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1448 == Reported By:kre Assigned To: