Minutes of the 31st August 2023 Teleconference

All Enclosed are the minutes of the thursday call this week regards Andrew - Minutes of the 31st August 2023 TeleconferenceAustin-1341 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 1st September 2023 Attendees: Nick Stoughton, Logitech/USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

Re: bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 03:10:58PM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 8/31/23 11:35 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > In today's Austin Group call, we discussed the fact that printf(1) has > > mandated behavior for %b (escape sequence processing similar to XSI > > echo) that will eventually conflict with C2x's

Re: bug#65659: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

On 2023-08-31 08:35, Eric Blake wrote: Typing-wise, %#s as a synonym for %b is probably going to be easier (less shell escaping needed). Is there any interest in a patch to coreutils or bash that would add such a synonym, to make it easier to leave that functionality in place for POSIX Issue 9

Re: RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

On 8/31/23 11:35 AM, Eric Blake wrote: In today's Austin Group call, we discussed the fact that printf(1) has mandated behavior for %b (escape sequence processing similar to XSI echo) that will eventually conflict with C2x's desire to introduce %b to printf(3) (to produce 0b000... binary

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001774. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo

[Issue 8 drafts 0001774]: Support ' as a format specifier flag character in utilities

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001771. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1774 == Reported By:eblake Assigned

[Issue 8 drafts 0001774]: Support ' as a format specifier flag character in utilities

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1774 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001771]: support or reserve %q as printf-utility format specifier

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 == Reported By:calestyo Assigned To:

RFC: changing printf(1) behavior on %b

In today's Austin Group call, we discussed the fact that printf(1) has mandated behavior for %b (escape sequence processing similar to XSI echo) that will eventually conflict with C2x's desire to introduce %b to printf(3) (to produce 0b000... binary literals). For POSIX Issue 8, we plan to mark

Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20120311T02

Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20120311T02

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001745]: tsort input and output format clarifications

The following issue has been UPDATED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1745 == Reported By:geoffclare Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001614]: XSH 3/mktime does not specify EINVAL and should

The following issue has been UPDATED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1614 == Reported By:kre Assigned To: