[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

The following issue has been CLOSED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1165 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1165 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1165 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To:

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

Stephane Chazelas wrote: > 2017-10-24 11:31:08 +0200, Joerg Schilling: > [...] > > Given that there is no standard for a VFS interface and the fact that the > > Linux > > VFS implementation is more than sub-optimal (see the discussions about > > reiserfs > > and

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

2017-10-24 11:31:08 +0200, Joerg Schilling: [...] > Given that there is no standard for a VFS interface and the fact that the > Linux > VFS implementation is more than sub-optimal (see the discussions about > reiserfs > and Linux) it would be a bad idea to standardize something that is based

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > |This is why I propose that POSIX goes into another direction: standardise > |an event loop. By doing this, we're not only avoiding the entire discussion > > What a terrible idea! You even want to take away the possibility > to implement the event

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1165 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001165]: What is the working group's plan for stateful polling (e.g., kqueue, epoll), event loops (libuv) and coroutines (C++2a)?

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1165 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To: