Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001106]: *rand48(): Should this use uint16_t instead of unsigned short?
To: austin-group-l@opengroup.org Subject: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001106]: *rand48(): Should this use uint16_t instead of unsigned short? The following issue has been CLOSED. == https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http
[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001106]: *rand48(): Should this use uint16_t instead of unsigned short?
The following issue has been CLOSED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1106 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To:
[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001106]: *rand48(): Should this use uint16_t instead of unsigned short?
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1106 == Reported By:EdSchouten Assigned To: