On 15/12/2019 12:38, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sat, 14 Dec 2019 14:41:34 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <9cbcf0fd-83d1-b449-cfe8-eafdee14b...@gigawatt.nl>
| This was not an exhaustive list, nor was it intended to be.
Still, if one relies (at all) upon
Date:Sat, 14 Dec 2019 14:41:34 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <9cbcf0fd-83d1-b449-cfe8-eafdee14b...@gigawatt.nl>
| This was not an exhaustive list, nor was it intended to be.
Still, if one relies (at all) upon behaviouir of pdksh and posh in
an argument,
On 14/12/2019 11:29, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 13 Dec 2019 08:57:28 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <9c1e4a98-e557-e5d1-27bc-05e7bbfe5...@gigawatt.nl>
| Pretending such scripts are portable does a disservice to users.
Since the shells you said are
Date:Fri, 13 Dec 2019 08:57:28 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <9c1e4a98-e557-e5d1-27bc-05e7bbfe5...@gigawatt.nl>
| Pretending such scripts are portable does a disservice to users.
Since the shells you said are "different" are pdksh, posh, bosh, and
old
Robert Elz wrote:
> If we keep making more and more unspecified, it just keeps getting harder
> and harder to write a script that will do something useful, and older
> scripts are less likely to keep working.
>
> Making things unspecified because some shells have, or had, bugs, or
> because some
On 13/12/2019 00:44, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:37:55 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID:
| This change would benefit not just those shells, but also other existing
| shells,
The point of the standard isn't to benefit the shells
Date:Fri, 13 Dec 2019 07:44:57 +0700
From:Robert Elz
Message-ID: <15286.1576197...@jinx.noi.kre.to>
| never the write answer.
That was, or course, a brain fade, homonyms gone wild ... but somehow
seems slightly apt!
kre
Date:Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:37:55 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID:
| This change would benefit not just those shells, but also other existing
| shells,
The point of the standard isn't to benefit the shells (whatever it
may appear from the people who are
On 12/12/2019 17:17, Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote:
--
(0004684) geoffclare (manager) - 2019-12-12 17:17
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295#c4684
The following issue has been CLOSED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
The following issue has been set CHILD OF issue 0001234.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1295
==
Reported By:hvd
Assigned To:
18 matches
Mail list logo