k...@keldix.com wrote in
<20220110211651.ga2...@www5.open-std.org>:
|
|please also consider iso 30112, which is a full iso standard,
|and written in posix style. it was taken from glibc, after glibc took \
|it from the iso 14652,
|it has a number of categories in eccess of the posix oncs,
please also consider iso 30112, which is a full iso standard,
and written in posix style. it was taken from glibc, after glibc took it from
the iso 14652,
it has a number of categories in eccess of the posix oncs, including lc_paper.
also note that for turkish a 'small i with dot' uppercases to
shwaresyst wrote, on 07 Jan 2022:
>
> The first Issue 8 draft is focusing, afaik, on adding the C1x changes and
> Mantis Issue 8 tagged items. The changes to XBD 6, 7, etc., that will
> formally add a POSIX UTF8 locale are to be part of the second, maybe third,
> draft. This is why you don't
C11 tried to add the minimal support for UTF-8, with the u8 string constant
prefix, but in a broken manner. C2x provides what can be considered a fix for
this, but does it in a mostly unusable way from the aspect of supporting
multiple locale languages. That is why you don't see anything about
Hello.
shwaresyst wrote in
<1494661216.220561.1641574109...@mail.yahoo.com>:
[i resort a bit]
| On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 3:40 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l \
| at The Open Group wrote: Hello!
|
|I wonder about POSIX.utf-?8, i tried to remember any statement
|i had read, and
The first Issue 8 draft is focusing, afaik, on adding the C1x changes and
Mantis Issue 8 tagged items. The changes to XBD 6, 7, etc., that will formally
add a POSIX UTF8 locale are to be part of the second, maybe third, draft. This
is why you don't see them yet.
For maximum compatibility with
Hello!
I wonder about POSIX.utf-?8, i tried to remember any statement
i had read, and Mantis did not show up results.
In particular i am interested in whether LC_CTYPE results will
bring true Unicode support or not, the reason i am asking is that
the upcoming version of my work-box GNU
