Thank you for the reply.
https://posix.rhansen.org/p/gettext_draft
Line 357
Geoff Clare wrote:
> However, we have rearranged the wording in a way that
> we hope makes it clearer it is a requirement on implementations.
Thank you; it is clearer now. It would be even clearer if there was a
Bruno Haible wrote, on 12 May 2022:
>
> https://posix.rhansen.org/p/gettext_draft
> Line 357
>
> "The returned string shall not be ... invalidated by a subsequent call
> to a gettext family function."
This was discussed in yesterday's call.
> It is not clear whether this sentence is an
https://posix.rhansen.org/p/gettext_draft
Line 357
"The returned string shall not be ... invalidated by a subsequent call
to a gettext family function."
It is not clear whether this sentence is an assertion (regarding how the
gettext() implementation behaves) or a requirement/restriction w.r.t.
