Re: is waitid() intentionally not required to be async-signal-safe?

2023-01-03 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Philip Guenther wrote, on 17 Dec 2022: > > I just noticed that waitid() is not included in the list of > async-signal-safe interfaces, at least as of TC2. Was that an intentional > decision or an oversight? Is there a known existing implementation where > it isn't? I think it is almost

is waitid() intentionally not required to be async-signal-safe?

2022-12-17 Thread Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
I just noticed that waitid() is not included in the list of async-signal-safe interfaces, at least as of TC2. Was that an intentional decision or an oversight? Is there a known existing implementation where it isn't? (...or did I miss an existing bug about this?) Philip Guenther