Re: pax -s option and symlink targets

2021-07-10 Thread tg...@mirbsd.org via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group dixit: >I don't know if NetBSD have switched to libarchive for their tar >yet Define “yet”. libarchive is chiefly a FreeBSD thing, and on the BSD side, paxtar will continue to be developed, so we have multiple implementations (which is A

Re: pax -s option and symlink targets

2021-07-04 Thread Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
2021-07-04 07:21:08 +0100, Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > Note that the equivalent --transform in the GNU implementation > of tar lets you specify whether to apply the transformation to > {sym,hard}links or not with flags. [...] Actually, libarchive's bsdtar

Re: pax -s option and symlink targets

2021-07-04 Thread Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
2021-07-03 18:43:40 -0700, Michael Forney via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > I'm working on an implementation of the pax tool, and am looking > for some clarification of how (if at all) the -s option should > interact with symlink targets. [...] See also:

pax -s option and symlink targets

2021-07-03 Thread Michael Forney via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Hello, I'm working on an implementation of the pax tool, and am looking for some clarification of how (if at all) the -s option should interact with symlink targets. Here are the relevant parts of the specification that I found: > -s replstr > Modify file or archive member names named by